From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8C044BE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:03:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 26 Jun 2018 00:03:11 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,273,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="67754908"
Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2018 00:03:03 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.17) by
 FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:03:03 -0700
Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by
 fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:03:03 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.51]) by
 SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:03:01 +0800
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org"
 <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Richardson, Bruce"
 <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Remove IPC threads
Thread-Index: AQHUBLS2PKFie3txNkSRAR62oKRw56RxvtGAgABtkUA=
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:03:01 +0000
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115323E2E4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <cover.1529071026.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> 
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNzhiN2VlZWUtYmVhZS00NmJiLTgzMmYtMzlkMzk5NGU1ZDg5IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiZHVRRXMzUnNcL3B0WTdJTEFXNVJ1OUtTM09UdFVmQmZWQVQ3YmczY1lMZmdwQ1dQUGN5KzhJSFhrRlNKekNBd3YifQ==
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.200.100
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Remove IPC threads
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:03:13 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 9:19 AM
> To: 'Anatoly Burakov' <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>;
> thomas@monjalon.net; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Remove IPC threads
>=20
> Hi Anatoly and Thomas:
>=20
> Sorry for raise this late, but seems merge mp thread into interrupt threa=
d gives
> problem to enable hotplug on secondary [1].
>=20
> The issue is, when secondary want to attach a share device, it send reque=
st to
> primary Then primary is running in mp callback (mp thread) to attach devi=
ce, it
> will call rte_malloc which get chance to increase heap that will do sync =
IPC, You
> know, this is the limitation we can't do sync IPC in mp thread itself. so=
 the
> solution is try to move real work to a separate thread which has no limit=
ation
> to do sync IPC, and interrupt thread is the good candidate, because we ju=
st
> need to call rte_eal_set_alarm and we don't need to worry about the
> execution sequence.
>=20
> But if we merge mp thread into interrupt thread, the solution will not wo=
rk, we
> may need to create specific temporal thread to handle callback, but this =
looks
> like some re-build which we already have.

Ok, actually this method looks good to me :), I will send v4 to have this,
But please let me know if you have better idea.

> So I think we need to revisit if we need to merge the thread before we ha=
ve a
> good solution for such kind of issue.
>=20
> Thanks
> Qi
>=20
> [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-June/105018.html
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Burakov
> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 10:25 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>;
> > thomas@monjalon.net; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Remove IPC threads
> >
> > As previously discussed [1], IPC threads need to be removed and their
> > workload moved to interrupt thread.
> >
> > FreeBSD did not have an interrupt thread, nor did it support alarm
> > API. This patchset adds support for both on FreeBSD. FreeBSD interrupt
> > thread is based on kevent, FreeBSD's native event multiplexing
> > mechanism similar to Linux's epoll.
> >
> > The patchset makes FreeBSD's interrupts and alarm work just enough to
> > suffice for purposes of IPC, however there are really weird problems
> observed.
> > Specifically, FreeBSD's kevent timers are really slow to trigger for
> > some reason, sleeping on a 10ms timer as much as 200ms before waking
> > up. Interrupt handling on fd's is also a bit flaky.
> >
> > It has also been observed that both problems go away if we do not
> > affinitize master lcore (by commenting relevant code out [2]). It is
> > not known why these problems are observed, nor it is clear what a solut=
ion
> might entail.
> >
> > For the purposes of making IPC work and having rudimentary support for
> > alarm and interrupt API's, this patchset works fine. However, because
> > of the above described issues, documentation will not be updated to
> > indicate support for interrupts on FreeBSD at this time.
> >
> > [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/36579/
> > [2]
> > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c#n729
> >
> > Anatoly Burakov (4):
> >   ipc: remove IPC thread for async requests
> >   eal/bsdapp: add interrupt thread
> >   eal/bsdapp: add alarm support
> >   ipc: remove main IPC thread
> >
> > Jianfeng Tan (4):
> >   eal/linux: use glibc malloc in alarm
> >   eal/linux: use glibc malloc in interrupt handling
> >   eal: bring forward init of interrupt handling
> >   eal: add IPC type for interrupt thread
> >
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c               |  10 +-
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_alarm.c         | 299 +++++++++++-
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_alarm_private.h |  19 +
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c    | 460 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c       | 243 ++++-----
> >  .../common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h       |   1 +
> >  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c             |  10 +-
> >  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_alarm.c       |   9 +-
> >  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c  |  19 +-
> >  test/test/test_interrupts.c                   |  29 +-
> >  10 files changed, 899 insertions(+), 200 deletions(-)  create mode
> > 100644 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_alarm_private.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1