From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lhffjzh@126.com>
Received: from m15-114.126.com (m15-114.126.com [220.181.15.114])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D10376E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:47:52 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com;
 s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=wWn8l
 HPzK5/B1eT0QVhAD/95ZPhFothGfyclv1vIaFI=; b=hISpI+VW+/ZxMJinYE8iN
 SurQEHY7dOrXecQ9MXEKnwNY01koH1p89v72bmaY1B9ORiA2B2rtS0FVIPujFwO0
 hfVMp7DHGG5fiMIhLs3k4HQ2SHYMcYUeInsEWeSV34E10NWcOc7PuAAwz0NPkC58
 Vu97PgzfotR/wYfLX2NUBI=
Received: from qqPC (unknown [61.149.143.226])
 by smtp7 (Coremail) with SMTP id DsmowABn9CUOL_BUfmoDAA--.656S2;
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:47:14 +0800 (CST)
From: "lhffjzh" <lhffjzh@126.com>
To: "'Sujith Sankar \(ssujith\)'" <ssujith@cisco.com>,
 "'Wiles, Keith'" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
 "'Thomas Monjalon'" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <1416936405-25333-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com>
 <CALwxeUtn7N0q+_21JnUqsQ4NtxgtH_HsK7iDL117Yef9n+m_tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <D0E53052.2D122%ssujith@cisco.com> <2674084.jy5aRKvivQ@xps13>
 <D1147695.1518B%keith.wiles@intel.com> <D1162370.313E9%ssujith@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1162370.313E9%ssujith@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:47:15 +0800
Message-ID: <03fb01d05269$fe8d2110$fba76330$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHQCNU+jPhT7bDs3kWFOKEP7UckRpxyJUeAgAG5ZoCAAMVlgIAAXUkAgFSZPwCAAYO+gIA4qTkAgAAWD4CAAZrxAP//RIXA
Content-Language: zh-cn
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: KPg+ NhX8 QwtO TO11 Tkm3 UWJK az4M dPSx eiWB knsn k1Ta lbKP
 pDbI uoer 0JZC 2fmZ; 5;
 ZABlAHYAQABkAHAAZABrAC4AbwByAGcAOwBrAGUAaQB0AGgALgB3AGkAbABlAHMAQABpAG4AdABlAGwALgBjAG8AbQA7AHAAcgByAGEAbwBAAGMAaQBzAGMAbwAuAGMAbwBtADsAcwBzAHUAagBpAHQAaABAAGMAaQBzAGMAbwAuAGMAbwBtADsAdABoAG8AbQBhAHMALgBtAG8AbgBqAGEAbABvAG4AQAA2AHcAaQBuAGQALgBjAG8AbQA=;
 Sosha1_v1; 7; {827F57F5-5E15-45EA-8AD4-CC54DDF02CF8};
 bABoAGYAZgBqAHoAaABAADEAMgA2AC4AYwBvAG0A; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:47:07 GMT;
 VwBoAHkAIABvAG4AbAB5ACAAcgB4ACAAcQB1AGUAdQBlACAAIgAwACIAIABjAGEAbgAgAHIAZQBjAGUAaQB2AGUAIABuAGUAdAB3AG8AcgBrACAAcABhAGMAawBlAHQAIABiAHkAIABpADQAMABlACAATgBJAEMA
x-cr-puzzleid: {827F57F5-5E15-45EA-8AD4-CC54DDF02CF8}
X-CM-TRANSID: DsmowABn9CUOL_BUfmoDAA--.656S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73
 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUaNVyUUUUU
X-Originating-IP: [61.149.143.226]
X-CM-SenderInfo: hokiwyl2k6ij2wof0z/1tbiihitWU0vK-v37QAAsO
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "'Prasad Rao \(prrao\)'" <prrao@cisco.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e
	NIC
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:47:53 -0000

Hi All,

We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can
receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network
packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different
source ip address.

In addition, by our test, all of rx queues can receive network packet with
10G ixgbe NIC with similar code.


Thanks and Regards,
Haifeng