From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D8A3B5 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:47:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2017 05:47:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,141,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="64190364" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2017 05:47:03 -0800 Received: from FMSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:47:02 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.230]) by FMSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.203]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:47:02 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: DPDK , "iryzhov@nfware.com" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] moving away from coremask to corelist Thread-Index: AQHSgy4/lTXMSzfnREab3B7+0M/+oqFidB6AgABT7IA= Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:47:02 +0000 Message-ID: <040C4E03-41C4-4EBB-8788-96335C104208@intel.com> References: <20170209181450.58466-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> <20170209234233.63333-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> <2782356.hAb1fhpyXq@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2782356.hAb1fhpyXq@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.252.140.164] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] moving away from coremask to corelist X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:47:04 -0000 > On Feb 10, 2017, at 2:46 AM, Thomas Monjalon = wrote: >=20 > Hi Keith, >=20 > 2017-02-09 17:42, Keith Wiles: >> The coremask option in DPDK is difficult to use and we should be >> promoting the use of the corelist (-l) option. The patch series >> adjusts the docs to use -l EAL option instead of the -c option. >>=20 >> The patch series doc change only and is not required to be done >> in 17.02 release, but should be added to the 17.05 release. >> The -c option will be kept and not removed for now unless in the >> future we decide to deprecate the code. >>=20 >> v2 - Fix taskset back to using -c >>=20 >> Keith Wiles (11): >> doc/cryptodev: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/faq: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/freebsd: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/howto: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/linux: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/nics: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/prog_guide: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/testpmd: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/cryptoperf: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/xen: use corelist instead of coremask >> doc/sample_app: use corelist instead of coremask >=20 > In case you make new revisions, I think you can squash every patches > in a single one. They are all doing the same thing in different files. I have been known to squash patches before, so did not want to do it again = :-) Will submit a single patch as v3. Regards, Keith