DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@pensando.io>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Alfredo Cardigliano <cardigliano@ntop.org>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/13] net/ionic: clean up Tx queue version support
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:46:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05689D29-7F81-4DC6-817C-300358F0EFFE@pensando.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a90e9d91-7c68-e712-5ce2-c10ddac917ea@intel.com>



> On Jan 27, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On 1/18/2021 8:35 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>> The ionic PMD only supports TX queue version 1 or greater.
>> Version 1 introduced a new SGL format with support for more
>> fragments per descriptor.
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@pensando.io>
> 
> <...>
> 
>> @@ -925,6 +925,11 @@ ionic_lif_alloc(struct ionic_lif *lif)
>>    	ionic_lif_queue_identify(lif);
>>  +	if (lif->qtype_info[IONIC_QTYPE_TXQ].version < 1) {
>> +		IONIC_PRINT(ERR, "FW too old, please upgrade");
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Will this affect the end users, if they were using old FW?
> 
> Can you please document this new limitation in the diriver documentation and in the release notes?

I will come up with something.

We don’t believe it’s possible for anyone to be using FW that old; there were only a few customers with cards back then and all have been upgraded. We decided that locking old FW out would be better than adding complexity in the hot path to handle the old data structures.

-Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 20:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] net/ionic: fixes and optimizations Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/ionic: strip out unneeded interrupt code Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/13] net/ionic: observe endianness in firmware commands Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/13] net/ionic: observe endianness in Rx filter code Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] net/ionic: add an array-size macro Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 17:22   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-27 17:40     ` Andrew Boyer
2021-01-29 22:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/13] net/ionic: use the existing " Andrew Boyer
2021-02-02 12:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/13] net/ionic: query firmware for supported queue versions Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/13] net/ionic: clean up Tx queue version support Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 17:30   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-27 17:46     ` Andrew Boyer [this message]
2021-01-29 22:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/13] " Andrew Boyer
2021-02-02 12:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-05 20:20     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-05 20:26       ` Andrew Boyer
2021-02-05 20:34         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] net/ionic: inline queue flush function Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 17:36   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-27 17:43     ` Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 17:50       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/13] net/ionic: inline queue space function Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/13] net/ionic: observe endiannness in ioread/iowrite Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/13] net/ionic: fix to allow separate L3 and L4 csum offload Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/13] net/ionic: convert per-queue offloads into queue flags Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/13] net/ionic: fix up function attribute tags Andrew Boyer
2021-01-18 20:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/13] net/ionic: fix address handling in transmit code Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] net/ionic: fixes and optimizations Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-27 18:10   ` Andrew Boyer
2021-01-27 22:23     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-27 22:25       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-29 22:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: redefine array size macros Andrew Boyer
2021-02-01 22:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-01 22:32   ` Andrew Boyer
2021-02-02 12:30     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-22 17:09       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05689D29-7F81-4DC6-817C-300358F0EFFE@pensando.io \
    --to=aboyer@pensando.io \
    --cc=cardigliano@ntop.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).