From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12592A0C4D; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:28:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03824410DA; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:28:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCCE40142 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:28:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [100.65.5.102] (unknown [5.144.120.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412DB7F514; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:28:44 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 412DB7F514 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1634084924; bh=zwsNcKzpmt04126g5DQRJHfJz/raQ4+HT1bFximkeXU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RGYSVvpj9QYoR3/lfwjTwj/0eOA8qjlRzwQEd5ArtWFNsGtAdplIamv6sC8+soqSO muH6MY3Pwh7vuHCG9fpy7bN13mXNexUD1fzBZQnxNpe7/DTi78UVPSlHbd3LHGC7yD tOf4YU/AvA6KgMiZKdwbP/jUkbd9mI4xR6dUhzKU= To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org References: <20210929205730.775-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> <20211004235558.14593-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> <0882998b-69d1-3c0f-2b64-e5b55e7b2914@intel.com> From: Ivan Malov Message-ID: <05d34e4d-d92f-a731-7377-263b6c44ce48@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:28:37 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0882998b-69d1-3c0f-2b64-e5b55e7b2914@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/10] net/sfc: add support for tunnel offload X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Ferruh, On 13/10/2021 02:46, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/5/2021 12:55 AM, Ivan Malov wrote: >> The first 6 patches comprise the fundamental part of the series. >> They are trying to be future-proof with respect to the planned >> HW/FW changes. 4 more patches form the adaptation part of some >> sort to make the offload work on the currently available HW/FW. >> >> This patch series should be applied on top of another patch >> series named "A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data": >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=19373 >> >> Changes in v2: >> * Rebase on top of v4 of the above mentioned patch series >> >> Ivan Malov (10): >>    net/sfc: fence off 8 bits in Rx mark for tunnel offload >>    common/sfc_efx/base: add API to set RECIRC ID in outer rules >>    net/sfc: support JUMP flows in tunnel offload >>    common/sfc_efx/base: add RECIRC ID match in action rules API >>    net/sfc: support GROUP flows in tunnel offload >>    net/sfc: implement control path operations in tunnel offload >>    net/sfc: override match on ETH in tunnel offload JUMP rules >>    net/sfc: use action rules in tunnel offload JUMP rules >>    net/sfc: support counters in tunnel offload JUMP rules >>    net/sfc: refine pattern of GROUP flows in tunnel offload >> > > Hi Ivan, > > Can you also this set on top of next-net? Previous sfc patches are > conflicting with this one. Done. Thank you. > > Thanks, > ferruh -- Ivan M