From: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
"Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:37:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0765ebaa-bb3b-4664-f8f5-01de3d5d5d07@ashroe.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB4484944DEBF61BB15CAC065FD8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Folks,
On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote:
>>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable
>> APIs?
>>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it
>>> experimental Forever.
>>> The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as
>>> experimental And mark the others as stable.
>> We could potentially make capability related functions stable but for others
>> there are still some many uncertainties, another example:
>> Ecdsa op expects 'k' in "in the interval (1, n-1)", openssl pmd will not even
>> have function that accepts 'k' (although optionally inverse of k yes), what
>> should user put then here?
>>
>> This API needs more attention I believe, I can send patches for it after 21.11
>> release.
>> My opinion is that we should push all this by another year.
>>
> Ok will drop this patch for now.
>
Look since everyone is in alignment here, I am going to ask the symbol bot to ignore
the asym crypto APIs for the next year. Thanks for the diligence on this, and thanks to
Fan for sending me an FYI.
Ray K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-31 18:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 15:49 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-03 15:17 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 11:42 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-07 11:45 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-08 12:37 ` Kinsella, Ray [this message]
2023-02-02 10:49 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-02-02 11:02 ` Hemant Agrawal
2023-02-14 18:05 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:54 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-15 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-31 18:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 8:50 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 8:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 16:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-12 8:31 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 6:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 8:53 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 8:50 ` [dpdk-dev] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-11 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-10-12 9:55 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 10:50 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:28 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 11:34 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 13:38 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 13:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 14:18 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 14:47 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 15:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13 5:36 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13 7:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13 7:04 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13 8:39 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-18 5:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 5:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 15:39 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0765ebaa-bb3b-4664-f8f5-01de3d5d5d07@ashroe.eu \
--to=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).