From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D4A00BE; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:56:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930951BFCC; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:56:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [148.163.129.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAC75B3E for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:56:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us2.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 171A770007F; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (91.220.146.112) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:55:46 +0000 To: Olivier Matz , CC: Anatoly Burakov , Ferruh Yigit , "Giridharan, Ganesan" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda , Stephen Hemminger , "Thomas Monjalon" , Vamsi Krishna Attunuru References: <20190719133845.32432-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20191030143619.4007-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20191030143619.4007-7-olivier.matz@6wind.com> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <085a45b5-4bf5-4c45-dd89-afa79eb73a19@solarflare.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:55:42 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191030143619.4007-7-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [91.220.146.112] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-25010.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.124900-8.000000-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: fgYTp5XatxbmLzc6AOD8DfHkpkyUphL9sSGFk6E8LPfSson97gLrTKEG Khm9baaN3DlDoCL1qzfz+25q0aLTRoaw96TXEsdWLbjXqdzdtCV9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwIq9 5DjCZh0zLOq+UXtqwWAtuKBGekqUpm+MB6kaZ2g4Llp/1N+SOmG0r5U985sX6B52+MpWXjGAJIx qNDRcrj2W04JF3gjl7UdNvZjjOj9C63BPMcrcQuXeYWV2RaAfD8VsfdwUmMsnud1QdQyZe7n7cG d19dSFd X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-TMASE-Result: 10-0.124900-8.000000 X-TMASE-Version: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-25010.003 X-MDID: 1572447363-zvSXnxeMNtub Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] mempool: use the specific macro for object alignment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/30/19 5:36 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > For consistency, RTE_MEMPOOL_ALIGN should be used in place of > RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE. They have the same value, because the only arch > that was defining a specific value for it has been removed from dpdk. > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko