From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A44A32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAD41C2EA; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1E71C229 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9OKMFbD106737; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vufp07fwm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from m0098393.ppops.net (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9OKMIt2106950; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:26:38 -0400 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vufp07fw5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:26:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9OKPJuc028556; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:37 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2vqt488tk9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:37 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9OKQaCr49283352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:36 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D56EC6059; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB59C6057; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davids-mbp.usor.ibm.com (unknown [9.70.85.14]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:26:35 +0000 (GMT) To: David Marchand , Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: dev , Gavin Hu , nd , Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Pavan Nikhilesh , Honnappa Nagarahalli References: <1561911676-37718-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1566454356-37277-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> From: David Christensen Message-ID: <089b2b55-e8f3-865f-8e92-a1acd99f08a8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:26:35 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-24_11:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=655 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910240190 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] use WFE for locks and ring on aarch64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > This series got a lot of attention from ARM people and it seems ready > for integration. > But I did not see comment from other architectures, could you have a > look please? I spent some time going through the Power ISA specification and the Linux code and didn't find an equivalent. Under Linux this looks like a __cmpwait_case_XX operation but that's only defined for arm64 and used in barrier operations. Dave