From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC0DA04C2; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:27:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F98937A2; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:27:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E442952 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:27:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id t3so6299912pgl.5 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 23:27:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=wRmYpziuVd6fWT3c8xMOVHD14C+/vlP6P23uMgwHfoo=; b=SVXDXomk9izMrEFwOb/eCAXHH490lYPSOGV6OQ5ejkMrEsEDTvHQtzI9ULH1QrVlpX niYD+yg4tur7x1SP9DSpbskCNTpUni6AOfBZb+RUcHSYgPmvlYPyF7NPaCgfOe0CEJo9 ygmvUruGfdOiYcsrOvvW49Xfqpap/pn/4OCQhECNV1ngN6kDatahCRAkeNZFJBq1mCm4 Luhct62oUl4i4w7af/brg9U3nPh+M5WvRyobVhCrXY9cc+LjKSTBK6n3/s/0bQt35MgC iJXSao9PQtrhKX4FUd94gfnhq7O8o+fOXXoy4uiV/zJFXJKqhUrUXBAfKTGfH5oIVIpN 27xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=wRmYpziuVd6fWT3c8xMOVHD14C+/vlP6P23uMgwHfoo=; b=fBCi6I6X5LPWOuuPFsFiZ/qP68yBbxAnwTSP6cvQhdHL06DjKxe6TLWsl4wJm6lwBh 8oku9XQFY0e0+VgGSrT+oboxvntLy5KNXiniwh8VEu8Wbi6nYIo8KQ02sas0yr/2akts c9+KfPo1RKL40E1vNnm3mHKtou22iy6WqhF+1YT9dQ5s1PzGfkQwvup2fpa6WF+2B46K A2fA/ggK9VKQW+8AOgUO2aIPYGpSHMq8+ipqbtrRKp/EubJXgXAgrIo/qsCORz8u62MZ lDpdd7kj8HwHgOvHM+wtWA1S4vjXRt6ABp61mB2t4SdlXaGgdyN6ayacGVUX8boWv0lZ P80A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmqYoC0EkEoLZ7gcBESIrRcQ6AiUBH3ZBB0WqAJveNs5BqzLof QUPuXNzJAhlZfCqgXZpIAKdbMSEBREA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLojR4+fTZiArDNkm1wnv1XkzmB81nQkkPjvCDJ0Sze/GlzYeFPUAmslA4851QaeToHQmXWA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:e81a:: with SMTP id c26mr32927206pfi.246.1574666828243; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 23:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.194.64] ([61.120.150.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h195sm7294059pfe.88.2019.11.24.23.27.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Nov 2019 23:27:07 -0800 (PST) From: =?gb2312?B?utjF9A==?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Message-Id: <0B649466-6BA1-4E28-A176-71C51CB7A00A@bytedance.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:27:03 +0800 To: dev@dpdk.org, matan@mellanox.com, viacheslavo@mellanox.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] mlx5: the default rule makes VF rep cannot get packets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi,=20 We found the patch "net/mlx5: revert default rules amount optimization",=20= which installs a rule directing all egress traffic from VF to table 1, = results in=20 VF representors get no packets, even if there is no offload rules = installed.=20 I=A1=AFve tested both l2fwd and ovs-dpdk. However, PF rep works just = fine.=20 We are using dpdk 19.11-rc3 for evaluation.