That's expected behavior. rte_mbuf_clone() doesn't duplicate your packet data - instead new mbuf just attaches to existing data packet. If you need to modify one (or both) packet data after cloning - you can use rte_pktmbuf_copy() instead. As another alternative - have a look at examples/ip_multicast - It demonstrates how to send sake packet to multiple ip destinations over multiple ports without modifying the entire packet. It looks that you are trying to do something quite similar. Konstantin From: NAGENDRA BALAGANI Sent: Friday, December 23, 2022 7:01 AM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Kapil Kumar Jain Subject: Strange behavior with rte_pktmbuf_clone cal Hi, I am seeing strange behavior where rte_pktmbuf_clone is not giving desired result. Here is the detailed info, in my dpdk application , once I received the packet info in mbuf, I need to send the same packet to two destinations, the sequence I should follow is, (i) First, Tunnel the packet to one of desired destination, so I created the shallow copy using rte_pktmbuf_clone, had another mbuf for Outer IP Header for IPinIP tunnel and sent to NIC. (ii) Second, I need to modify the source and destination ip addresses of the packet and send out. The issue, I am seeing is the tunneled packet (clone) have modified IP addresses from (ii). Code flow: Main() { Struct rte_mbuf *org_mbuf; //lets assume this org_mbuf is holding the packet info. (i) Towards First destination. Build_tunnel_packet(org_mbuf) { * Struct rte_mbuf *clone_buffer; * Allocate a clone buffer Clone_buffer = rte_pktmbuf_clone(org_mbuf, clone_pool); * Constructed IPinIP info in another mbuf and prepended in clone_buffer * Call rte_pktmbuf_tx_burst(); } (ii) Towards another destination. Modify_l3_and_route(org_mbuf) { * Modify L3 information of 'org_mbuf' * and Call rte_pkt_mbuf_tx_burst(); } } [cid:image002.jpg@01D916EA.D92B9250] In the above screenshot, the packet 37 should tunneled as it is by adding the outer ip layer(i.e 182.16.146.*), but the inner L3 information also getting changed (which I am modifying in the second step) for some packets. Using, rte_pktmbuf_copy(), solving the issue, but in expense of extra mbuf. Please, help me in understanding what is wrong in the case of rte_pktmbuf_clone()? Regards, Nagendra