RE: [PATCH v3 10/33] net/ena/hal: added a bus parameter to ena memcpy macro

["Brandes, Shai" <shaibran@amazon.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 7:25 PM
> To: Brandes, Shai <shaibran@amazon.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3 10/33] net/ena/hal: added a bus
> parameter to ena memcpy macro
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
> content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/6/2024 12:24 PM, shaibran@amazon.com wrote:
> > From: Shai Brandes <shaibran@amazon.com>
> >
> > ENA_MEMCPY_TO_DEVICE_64 macro needs pci bus id in order to write to
> > the device memory when using llq.
> >
> 
> As far as I can see macro doesn't use 'bus' at all, "(void)(bus);", how/why it is
> needed for LLQ? Can you please describe it more?
[Brandes, Shai] I understand the confusion.
This is part of a hal change that concerns mac OS and required to modify the common ENA_MEMCPY_TO_DEVICE_64.
Since we expose only the DPDK-specific implementation, where this parameter is unused, it appears as void.
Avoiding this will create differences between the internal and upstream versions which will make it hard to maintain.