DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:51:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a7b26ee-d16e-5157-01c8-dd19da6317b1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1725622420.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

for commit 1~4,
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>

On 2024/9/6 19:47, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> While initially, DPDK has used the term "socket ID" to refer to physical package
> ID, the last time DPDK read "physical_package_id" for socket ID was ~9 years
> ago, so it's been a while since we've actually switched over to using the term
> "socket" to mean "NUMA node".
> 
> This wasn't a problem before, as most systems had one NUMA node per physical
> socket. However, in the last few years, more and more systems have multiple NUMA
> nodes per physical CPU socket. Since DPDK used NUMA nodes already, the
> transition was pretty seamless, however now we're faced with a situation when
> most of our documentation still uses outdated terms, and our API is ripe with
> references to "sockets" when in actuality we mean "NUMA nodes". This could be a
> source of confusion.
> 
> While completely renaming all of our API's would be a huge effort, will take a
> long time and arguably wouldn't even be worth the API breakages (given that this
> mismatch between terminology and reality is implicitly understood by most people
> working on DPDK, and so this isn't so much of a problem in practice), we can do
> some tweaks around the edges and at least document this unfortunate reality.
> 
> This patchset suggests the following changes:
> 
> - Update rte_socket/rte_lcore documentation to refer to NUMA nodes rather than
> sockets - Rename internal structures' fields to better reflect this intention -
> Rename --socket-mem/--socket-limit flags to refer to NUMA rather than sockets -
> Add internal API to get physical package ID [1]
> 
> The documentation is updated to refer to new EAL flags, but is otherwise left
> untouched, and instead the entry in "glossary" is amended to indicate that when
> DPDK documentation refers to "sockets", it actually means "NUMA ID's". As next
> steps, we could rename all API parameters to refer to NUMA ID rather than socket
> ID - this would not break neither API nor ABI, and instead would be a
> documentation change in practice.
> 
> [1] This could be used to group lcores by physical package, see e.g. discussion
>     under this patch: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20240827151014.201-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com/
> 
> Anatoly Burakov (5):
>   eal: update socket ID API documentation
>   lcore: rename socket ID to NUMA ID
>   eal: rename socket ID to NUMA ID in internal config
>   eal: rename --socket-mem/--socket-limit
>   lcore: store physical package ID internally
> 
>  doc/guides/faq/faq.rst                        |  4 +--
>  doc/guides/howto/lm_bond_virtio_sriov.rst     |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/howto/lm_virtio_vhost_user.rst     |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/howto/pvp_reference_benchmark.rst  |  4 +--
>  .../virtio_user_for_container_networking.rst  |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/linux_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst    | 20 +++++------
>  doc/guides/linux_gsg/linux_eal_parameters.rst | 16 ++++-----
>  doc/guides/nics/mlx4.rst                      |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst                      |  2 +-
>  .../prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst      | 12 +++----
>  doc/guides/prog_guide/glossary.rst            |  5 ++-
>  doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst  |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/bbdev_app.rst        |  6 ++--
>  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst      |  6 ++--
>  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vdpa.rst             |  2 +-
>  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst            |  4 +--
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_dynmem.c            | 14 ++++----
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c             | 28 +++++++++++++---
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c           | 33 ++++++++++---------
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c            | 12 +++----
>  lib/eal/common/eal_internal_cfg.h             | 10 +++---
>  lib/eal/common/eal_options.h                  |  8 +++--
>  lib/eal/common/eal_private.h                  |  5 ++-
>  lib/eal/common/eal_thread.h                   | 11 +++++++
>  lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c                  |  2 +-
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c                         |  2 +-
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal_lcore.c                   |  6 ++++
>  lib/eal/include/rte_lcore.h                   | 25 +++++++-------
>  lib/eal/linux/eal.c                           | 22 ++++++-------
>  lib/eal/linux/eal_lcore.c                     | 28 ++++++++++++++++
>  lib/eal/linux/eal_memory.c                    | 22 ++++++-------
>  lib/eal/windows/eal.c                         |  2 +-
>  lib/eal/windows/eal_lcore.c                   |  7 ++++
>  33 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-09  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-06 11:47 Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-06 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] eal: update socket ID API documentation Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-06 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] lcore: rename socket ID to NUMA ID Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-06 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] eal: rename socket ID to NUMA ID in internal config Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-06 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] eal: rename --socket-mem/--socket-limit Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-09  7:42   ` fengchengwen
2024-09-06 11:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] lcore: store physical package ID internally Anatoly Burakov
2024-09-09  7:49   ` fengchengwen
2024-09-06 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK Morten Brørup
2024-09-06 12:46   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-06 13:02     ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-06 13:07       ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-06 13:17         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-06 13:58           ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-09  7:51 ` fengchengwen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a7b26ee-d16e-5157-01c8-dd19da6317b1@huawei.com \
    --to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).