From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@altera.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"Vikas Gupta" <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
Chenbo Xia <chenbox@nvidia.com>,
"Nipun Gupta" <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
Tomasz Duszynski <tduszynski@marvell.com>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/9] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b459c44-a262-43b8-950c-dae90c0f6f2d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903151800.1965006-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On 9/3/2025 5:17 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Contrary to what the VFIO_PRESENT macro may suggest, there is no check on
> whether VFIO is enabled in the (build system) Linux kernel configuration.
>
> Replace check on VFIO_PRESENT with RTE_EAL_VFIO (for components built on
> FreeBSD or Windows), or simply remove it otherwise.
>
> Then remove inclusion of rte_vfio.h when the only purpose was checking
> VFIO_PRESENT.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@altera.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 7:28 [RFC 0/8] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 1/8] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-03 9:38 ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 2/8] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 3/8] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 4/8] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 5/8] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 6/8] vfio: stop including Linux kernel header in public and driver API David Marchand
2025-09-03 9:38 ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 7/8] uapi: import VFIO header David Marchand
2025-09-03 7:28 ` [RFC 8/8] vfio: use imported uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-03 9:38 ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03 7:50 ` [RFC 0/8] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux " David Marchand
2025-09-03 9:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 9:52 ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 14:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 0/9] " David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 1/9] drivers: remove unneeded VFIO header inclusion David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 2/9] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 3/9] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 4/9] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 5/9] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 6/9] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:22 ` [RFC v2 0/9] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17 ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 1/9] drivers: remove unneeded VFIO header inclusion David Marchand
2025-09-09 14:05 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 2/9] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-19 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 3/9] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-09 15:17 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 4/9] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-09 15:37 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-18 8:38 ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 5/9] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-10 12:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 6/9] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-19 13:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 7/9] vfio: stop including Linux kernel header in public and driver API David Marchand
2025-09-17 14:34 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 8/9] uapi: import VFIO header David Marchand
2025-09-06 4:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-18 8:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-09-18 15:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-19 8:28 ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17 ` [RFC v2 9/9] vfio: use imported uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-04 7:08 ` [RFC v2 0/9] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux " David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] " David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] uapi: fix include guards in VDUSE imported header David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drivers: remove unneeded VFIO header inclusion David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] vfio: stop including Linux kernel header in public and driver API David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] uapi: import VFIO header David Marchand
2025-09-19 8:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio: use imported uAPI header David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b459c44-a262-43b8-950c-dae90c0f6f2d@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=rosen.xu@altera.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
--cc=tduszynski@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).