From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EF8439C4; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16701402D7; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.3]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3152F402AB for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC377246A6 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B0B7C245F2; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:54 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on hermod.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 Received: from [192.168.1.59] (h-62-63-215-114.A163.priv.bahnhof.se [62.63.215.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D2BF245F1 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <0e268757-8368-456f-ba2f-10a1969c498f@lysator.liu.se> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:53:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "dev@dpdk.org" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= Subject: rte_atomic_*_explicit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Why do rte_stdatomic.h functions have the suffix "_explicit"? Especially since there aren't any wrappers for the implicit variants. More to type, more to read. When was this API introduced? Shouldn't it say "experimental" somewhere?