From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: fix slow allocation of large mempools
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:57:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e310d2d-3455-4201-6aa9-6f5c7b2032e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200109132742.15828-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
On 09-Jan-20 1:27 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> When allocating a mempool which is larger than the largest
> available area, it can take a lot of time:
>
> a- the mempool calculate the required memory size, and tries
> to allocate it, it fails
> b- then it tries to allocate the largest available area (this
> does not request new huge pages)
> c- add this zone to the mempool, this triggers the allocation
> of a mem hdr, which request a new huge page
> d- back to a- until mempool is populated or until there is no
> more memory
>
> This can take a lot of time to finally fail (several minutes): in step
> a- it takes all available hugepages on the system, then release them
> after it fails.
>
> The problem appeared with commit eba11e364614 ("mempool: reduce wasted
> space on populate"), because smaller chunks are now allowed. Previously,
> it had to be at least one page size, which is not the case in step b-.
>
> To fix this, implement our own way to allocate the largest available
> area instead of using the feature from memzone: if an allocation fails,
> try to divide the size by 2 and retry. When the requested size falls
> below min_chunk_size, stop and return an error.
>
> Fixes: eba11e364614 ("mempool: reduce wasted space on populate")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---
I don't particularly like the idea of working around this issue as
opposed to fixing it memzone-side, but since there's currently no plan
to address this in memzone allocator, this should work much better than
before.
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-09 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 13:27 Olivier Matz
2020-01-09 13:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2020-01-09 16:06 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-01-09 17:27 ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-10 9:53 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-17 8:45 ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-17 9:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2020-01-17 10:01 ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-17 10:09 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-20 10:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-19 12:29 ` Ali Alnubani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e310d2d-3455-4201-6aa9-6f5c7b2032e3@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).