DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
	tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com, jianbo.liu@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eal/arm: introduce CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON_MEMCPY
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:29:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10088842.WxuXTY5r1p@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160320104110.3c05f405@jvn>

2016-03-20 10:41, Jan Viktorin:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:14:57 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> 
> > 2016-03-19 20:58, Jan Viktorin:
> > > The flag is used to enable memcpy optimizations in EAL. As it is not always
> > > the performance benefit, the flag allows to disable it.  
> > 
> > Ideally the default should be to choose the best optimization.
> > If it is not possible, it would help to have some comments explaining
> > how to choose wether enabling NEON memcpy or not.
> 
> Ok, we can rename the option to CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_AVOID_NEON_MEMCPY,
> delete it from the defconfig and change the test in rte_memcpy_32.h to
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_AVOID_NEON_MEMCPY
> 
> Alternatively, to have a positive test like
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_AVOID_NEON_MEMCPY
> 
> I can create a bigger change that moves the non-neon-memcpy up in the
> file...
> 
> Should I resend the whole series as v3?

No, I don't think changing the name of the config or moving code
will change anything.
We just need to understand when it must be enabled or disabled.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-20 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-19  9:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] arm: detect NEON by RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON flag only Jan Viktorin
2016-03-19 11:05 ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-19 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] " Jan Viktorin
2016-03-24 16:47   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-19 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] arm: remove CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON Jan Viktorin
2016-03-19 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] arm: detect NEON cpu feature by checking __ARM_NEON Jan Viktorin
2016-03-20 17:27   ` Jerin Jacob
2016-03-19 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] arm: detect NEON by checking RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON Jan Viktorin
2016-03-19 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eal/arm: introduce CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON_MEMCPY Jan Viktorin
2016-03-19 20:14   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-20  9:41     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-20  9:46       ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-20 10:33         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-20 10:29       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-03-20 17:38         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-03-21  5:42   ` Jianbo Liu
2016-03-21 12:21     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-21 13:24       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-21 14:01         ` Jan Viktorin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10088842.WxuXTY5r1p@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
    --cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).