From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5A343026; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CABA40DFB; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E56140691 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E73200957; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:34:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:34:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1691674487; x=1691760887; bh=wi8/EnQ2xQG+9B9XvA2pO0JQWGLFejyjGcY d3bXKuHM=; b=SF+j9/mCpAkohjpBfuqz9E/48b2OLWMEEhFeIqj4RUacYa0Iteg PkDEGdcUZfZqr8rxfNOZLjDnuFbBXgkpa49cO3MqvlGLL4PWNMR76B9hxj/lWRSA 4QKPlKXGmOXDzqjLFcrUAYShrGEieJ+vWUAKnte0teTaK72G3T0qu/H2saypIJX/ e+X9svLea9je2/v2R7JVp316TBhB5wntPaiHbXwidh3Vrv5rizTeCtq7cC9d8OkC TKoBmhEMazV3qcYOyKqS5PI3ov1bu0asj70zbjvq4iqB/6y0rW5PsqXA0E4t0l4S oTsFExSFw7R9WIrYhSF0V7YwQIsj0rB5OuQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1691674487; x=1691760887; bh=wi8/EnQ2xQG+9B9XvA2pO0JQWGLFejyjGcY d3bXKuHM=; b=MOKk7PIVVBwKI08lFzjUsl87IZfxmlx0lzLy+2hd300/ykuTiom 5ciLZ0iJr6msNcAv95cbD/cMMy2+gjFTf+skoK9NRjuEiotRt6Q03M6I7x8UrT4R Tk4f8I/c6F3x0icVH27LMjo7rHO1d1vjzXJjywPrTg4pVB0OO0VrUt8WurD+mmpi veBpPyfIJeBIzr+/cUoipMNr0KLXqShDM2Qc5DX36gl2YewH/sPaars9Q66t5wm1 t4GwDNEZAvcEYzUFWwcV5Cu2mxI6/qZkFgrMqy6pfFATSZrd7iyop8EWx9A+D0Wm A8+YOH4sjX7GZrT7l45PaOkOprpl1eh1JLA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrleeigdeihecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedttdeljeejgeffkeekkedtjeevtdehvedtkeeivdeuuedviedu vdelveejueejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:34:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson , David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Tyler Retzlaff , Ali Alnubani , galco@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] build: update DPDK to use C11 standard Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:43 +0200 Message-ID: <10316692.qUNvkh4Gvn@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230731103858.1491751-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20230802123134.370199-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting > > compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds. > > > > Forcing use of the C standard, rather than the standard with > > GNU extensions, means that some posix definitions which are not in > > the C standard are unavailable by default. We fix this by ensuring > > the correct defines or cflags are passed to the components that > > need them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > > Acked-by: Morten Br=C3=B8rup > > Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff > Tested-by: Ali Alnubani >=20 > The CI results look good. >=20 > Applied, thanks! The compiler support is updated, that's fine. Should we go further and document some major Linux distributions? One concern is to make clear RHEL 7 is not supported anymore. Should it be a release note?