From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A574046093; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:28:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DFE402B5; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:28:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008F640298 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:28:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9884A1063; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.39.16] (JR4XG4HTQC.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.39.16]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D03A3F673; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:28:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <10330c1f-338a-4445-b13d-f5ea97411365@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:28:47 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dts: fix pass rate edge case in results json Content-Language: en-GB To: Dean Marx Cc: probb@iol.unh.edu, npratte@iol.unh.edu, yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com, dev@dpdk.org References: <20250113215230.13942-1-dmarx@iol.unh.edu> From: Luca Vizzarro In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 15/01/2025 15:41, Dean Marx wrote: > Also, I noticed after submitting this first version that suites where > some cases are skipped and the rest pass have a 100% pass rate in the > results report. Should this also mean that suites where every case is > skipped have a 100% pass rate? Right now this reports a 0% when the > entire suite is skipped, if anyone thinks this should be changed let > me know. yes, I believe this sounds reasonable. Good catch