From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6F5A0542; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B179F4069D; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1D44003C for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4AA5C008B; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:55:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1661770540; x= 1661856940; bh=pNzUnWQiSu/YIzSAwAfe+xw/ZPHzZ3u8GhFryiG2Ot0=; b=K d+l2v1uSlZA5CAbWMc+d0MS+0+vPRBplr8ETJqIOAwDDOmKfwiIzOYaeXaTEMknK 2kKDtL+Baq90ArKzwJ8LNMqpjyQzMGop6sRrvgs+eCneIM2TKIuxEkOhi30mm9s8 jGL8XIX7owuUK/kxU/Wlf7qG/8UmLeXAf4gWT8Ww9I8zraqAR+R6i/UKNOhjx/lR xfxOfkT82FxVgsX1PgzddXpivmia4BbWCKW8A/qiDAQXbOmF6BNmInM6uw2Q+8lJ b38xUsb6p+GMyNwaFKl9wwHWKGLCuvI+6Ejh7A3yEC024xbkI9hk8bn8R4gSo8R9 PnMhJJrRxbCsnRvt9tGfg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1661770540; x= 1661856940; bh=pNzUnWQiSu/YIzSAwAfe+xw/ZPHzZ3u8GhFryiG2Ot0=; b=T zvzQoiP8YAskqbNw1S/xARjPqjpgdJwAbaJ+KN0yheV+TcqQdY4S7c+I2FHqQKSU Wzm7dKgI/7HWITDxcnZPi4uxEgn6ljAlG4WAsv+IuuahatpawtvlTVF64P4f7Nuz Ilt6erXl2d+s9k/0+S4t8VuNZaSYTdUSsZHeWJH9Qm40jwwAt3I4M5/gxkBbxIIq XiEa7XvKUqq9DLHpXdcxQW8EvUVPeU4mynHTX0nHy0/Mbgd4Hs5unckgASpl+tSH gRjQwT2SXFfzotSPNx2HnGdVJ5GFesiTseBcYGdQPk40D/7d5fh1QluQN/otOv07 tBRZyNmsuablITN8AJLfQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdekuddgfeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefhfejleeuvdevtddutdeutdevhfeijeethfffueejhfetuddu vedtkedtieekffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:55:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru, dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: rte_mov256 was missing for AVX2 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <10793250.BaYr0rKQ5T@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220820103032.119741-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> References: <20220820103032.119741-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 20/08/2022 12:30, Morten Br=F8rup: > The rte_mov256 function was missing for AVX2. > Does nobody build test for AVX2 and check the compiler output? Please could you specify the context/setup to reproduce the issue? An error message would be nice to paste here as well. Thanks