From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Gavin.Hu@arm.com, ravi1.kumar@amd.com,
g.singh@nxp.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
johndale@cisco.com, hyonkim@cisco.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com,
wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, rmody@marvell.com, shshaikh@marvell.com,
matan@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com,
declan.doherty@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] x86/eal: gcc 10 ignore stringop-overflow warnings
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:50:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <110dc2b9-02d8-1702-d496-b0b91b87451e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3643335.9fHWaBTJ5E@thomas>
On 17/04/2020 11:13, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 17/04/2020 11:33, Bruce Richardson:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:45:49PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>> stringop-overflow warns when it sees a possible overflow
>>> in a string operation.
>>>
>>> In the rte_memcpy functions different branches are taken
>>> depending on the size. stringop-overflow is raised for the
>>> branches in the function where it sees the static size of the
>>> src could be overflowed.
>>>
>>> However, in reality a correct size argument and in some cases
>>> dynamic allocation would ensure that this does not happen.
>>>
>>> For example, in the case below for key, the correct path will be
>>> chosen in rte_memcpy_generic at runtime based on the size argument
>>> but as some paths in the function could lead to a cast to 32 bytes
>>> a warning is raised.
>>>
>>> In function ‘_mm256_storeu_si256’,
>>> inlined from ‘rte_memcpy_generic’
>>> at ../lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h:315:2,
>>> inlined from ‘iavf_configure_rss_key’
>>> at ../lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h:869:10:
>>>
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/10/include/avxintrin.h:928:8:
>>> warning: writing 32 bytes into a region of size 1 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
>>> 928 | *__P = __A;
>>> | ~~~~~^~~~~
>>> In file included
>>> from ../drivers/net/iavf/../../common/iavf/iavf_prototype.h:10,
>>> from ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h:9,
>>> from ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c:22:
>>>
>>> ../drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c:
>>> In function ‘iavf_configure_rss_key’:
>>>
>>> ../drivers/net/iavf/../../common/iavf/virtchnl.h:508:5:
>>> note: at offset 0 to object ‘key’ with size 1 declared here
>>> 508 | u8 key[1]; /* RSS hash key, packed bytes */
>>> | ^~~
>>>
>>> Ignore the stringop-overflow warnings for rte_memcpy.h functions.
>>>
>>> Bugzilla ID: 394
>>> Bugzilla ID: 421
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> [...]
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
>>> +#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION >= 100000)
>>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow"
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Does this permanently need to be disabled for all compilation units
>> including rte_memcpy.h, or can it be used with a push/pop set of pragmas to
>> only disable for the required functions?
>
> Even better, isn't there a solution in memcpy code?
>
>
There may be, it could do with fresh eyes - Bruce/Konstantin?
In the meantime I will send a v3 with push/pop so it is available as an
option.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 14:11 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warning Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/2] meson: gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warnings Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] mk: " Kevin Traynor
2020-03-25 14:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warning Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-31 14:08 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-03-31 14:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-01 11:33 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-07 16:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: gcc 10 disable stringop-overflow warnings Kevin Traynor
2020-04-10 10:51 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-10 13:23 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-16 18:43 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-16 18:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] x86/eal: gcc 10 ignore " Kevin Traynor
2020-04-17 9:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-17 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-17 14:50 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2020-04-17 12:40 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-04-17 15:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Kevin Traynor
2020-05-06 9:20 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=110dc2b9-02d8-1702-d496-b0b91b87451e@redhat.com \
--to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=hyonkim@cisco.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
--cc=rmody@marvell.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).