From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0583F2BDF; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95830206A4; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:29:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=62TbYH8UbdudZcw o0XvHkBMCHxD4coNiQTpj7XAYH0o=; b=C2j3JEds5mL1c5C3JTbTFznMLV2w76t ApxQfN6ZlMphQrpUGmkUE0SFlluW70vsfT2ShX8uB1p7wCPGTTYMtu3u6+niOKZb NxOUSnny6VCRI3bpfiRmMBr33Frz/g+8u0lfWUInOF2JoN1wM5JTAlusa9ODt+f0 1ZcAwizLOdEQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=62TbYH8UbdudZcwo0XvHkBMCHxD4coNiQTpj7XAYH0o=; b=oXyPHCql 67bVnIinaHarcIIB8yF8LaHG5L3KVvhS8xWHI+2lVRWUn2IOiel8K3GOj6LhS+sx X+srJ3bl6X9Ug3TGypQHC1BNQGx70Es1VTE6qwkkEurl+gdGg+gF0BUyGHnY+b07 PO/OYEVyeK0DBjzztOBOs82UK40NK5eif+tKUiWEwWFQey1527NlYJxq9ePt9KtN dk70UjBVztD9UkZdYcfywgp7I9tm2IYK9zVzATUNPlmAo3UGFJaR7wciKOOW/pJq 4h904ugtWCf4txuSOECeIveel+sMjv3hd49UCAqIygmoE0Vf5D1L5QNTxPWtI3Ia aJLSZIyrYBzhcw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 0dK9kqYKL5vAQ58U6AuXdMRrd3SMr+q3rQGZ3rv3E75R 1497878970 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 521337E794; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:29:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tiwei Bie Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:29:29 +0200 Message-ID: <11265330.F2tAlQhP2k@xps> In-Reply-To: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> References: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on DPDK.org X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:29:31 -0000 Hi, 01/06/2017 07:07, Tiwei Bie: > We'd like to make a proposal of making DPDK.org allow hosting > some personal/project repos, which could be very useful when > someone wants to try some experimental projects in DPDK. It has been discussed during the last technical board meeting. The board was not convinced by this idea, but would like to better understand what is the problem to be solved with this proposal? If there is something to solve, we could decide one these proposals: 1/ let users free to choose their forge 2/ advise for gitlab 3/ advise for github (and fight to recover the name DPDK) 4/ pay a sysadmin to host and secure our own forge in dpdk.org domain