From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B1CA04CC; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:26:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0C61D731; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32FE1D730 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:26:16 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: WSYuEfGbKYWk3UPcGQxUDsHE0wTm6idbylC8QLvu2OR1u8Th6Qcbkvhsh0ogrCMnwonoGaVv7N X58cmDT2xkCg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9750"; a="178429782" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,286,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="178429782" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2020 04:26:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: IeYGXIjh5eFqicJ+tJCKx3FX2fg3TbDGkUO0wHknJD0oovtEFLFPe3pC4wqoQy3OIiIAv/DoCA fOVB4qcbo5mg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,286,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="308991643" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.217.64]) ([10.213.217.64]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2020 04:26:10 -0700 To: Chengchang Tang , Stephen Hemminger , thomas@monjalon.net Cc: dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@huawei.com References: <1592483709-7076-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com> <1599296854-56620-1-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com> <1599296854-56620-4-git-send-email-tangchengchang@huawei.com> <20200905095859.743243bb@hermes.lan> <975a84de-1455-737d-25a0-cc5f37cf31d8@huawei.com> <20200918151117.59037ea6@hermes.lan> <88b4cc70-5e8a-b3b8-82eb-3e8a97279fff@huawei.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <113bd21c-55d2-5167-0534-39ef65309f90@intel.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:26:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <88b4cc70-5e8a-b3b8-82eb-3e8a97279fff@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] app/procinfo: add Rx buffer size to --show-port X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/21/2020 3:06 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote: > Hi, All > These Patches improved procinfo was stuck in patchwork: > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/74960/ > > These patches look good for me. Will these be applied? > > I'm not sure what to do next. If these will be applied, I need modified > the code. Hi Chengchang, I suggest don't hold your patches and send your next version on top of latest head of git repo, based on which patch applied first we can resolve the conflict accordingly.