From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12CB1B2B3 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345252341E; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:07:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=HSEuDnnsyfLFD96Bb117pW1we+Am0MHsskyIRJND4c4=; b=hgIeXS7L4OI4 VMQ+2yqKM2xvl7D053ETJ6Z3A5wkwgxpYBcU3ioLsLMNs3+55cNS2TF5cyWet7f/ 575IHUd0mAZbq4cBJtNOOQIpfOQaD540ZwNbBSiOKY3+CoRcDyhGbD28HnpBrsuX zDkPjolVKwBRgFTg8T9iykzRhqhieH8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=HSEuDnnsyfLFD96Bb117pW1we+Am0MHsskyIRJND4 c4=; b=EDCWfsamhJhjfP9StGfcmGMAm5sgKtJOXzAefkK9JmobGI2FTotqzOVf5 b3naHwa07b4bMqUsdWU/ePAUnbQvEck0sUZr5AlD00EolF7p9o8Zz9PThm7Rw9Np WtTbpHvfAiaipxQXP5Brp8z1Jmf0gbZ6/ehn+SXsnMe2Ti9fAvhwe/xvjW+oO1pv h/nlIh7rjSGijFfVCJc/9HibuXEP7Dbm6AEKBwjwqqJlSOXRbjJiwAho65qRuFHe lshTD933ibOPmpEwhgT5SWcv+dUZVp5PLDGyg7JuqD3l13t+i8i4/9u8892OBWOH VNJTxFuZ5S7Je3uo+cY4pRCV0MK5g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtdeigdduieculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A70C310319; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:07:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Shreyansh Jain Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 01:07:56 +0200 Message-ID: <11516402.N1J9uK5kvY@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190404130437.GA1355@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190404110215.14410-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20190404114818.21286-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20190404130437.GA1355@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] config: increase the num of rawdev to be 64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 23:08:00 -0000 04/04/2019 15:04, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:50:18AM +0000, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > The current value is 10, which is not sufficient for many use-cases. > > e.g. NXP LX2 with raw qdma devices can use 32-48 raw devices in some > > use-cases. So, making it to 64 to cover various cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Series applied, thanks From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4196CA0679 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:08:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4EC1B394; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12CB1B2B3 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345252341E; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:07:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=HSEuDnnsyfLFD96Bb117pW1we+Am0MHsskyIRJND4c4=; b=hgIeXS7L4OI4 VMQ+2yqKM2xvl7D053ETJ6Z3A5wkwgxpYBcU3ioLsLMNs3+55cNS2TF5cyWet7f/ 575IHUd0mAZbq4cBJtNOOQIpfOQaD540ZwNbBSiOKY3+CoRcDyhGbD28HnpBrsuX zDkPjolVKwBRgFTg8T9iykzRhqhieH8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=HSEuDnnsyfLFD96Bb117pW1we+Am0MHsskyIRJND4 c4=; b=EDCWfsamhJhjfP9StGfcmGMAm5sgKtJOXzAefkK9JmobGI2FTotqzOVf5 b3naHwa07b4bMqUsdWU/ePAUnbQvEck0sUZr5AlD00EolF7p9o8Zz9PThm7Rw9Np WtTbpHvfAiaipxQXP5Brp8z1Jmf0gbZ6/ehn+SXsnMe2Ti9fAvhwe/xvjW+oO1pv h/nlIh7rjSGijFfVCJc/9HibuXEP7Dbm6AEKBwjwqqJlSOXRbjJiwAho65qRuFHe lshTD933ibOPmpEwhgT5SWcv+dUZVp5PLDGyg7JuqD3l13t+i8i4/9u8892OBWOH VNJTxFuZ5S7Je3uo+cY4pRCV0MK5g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtdeigdduieculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A70C310319; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:07:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Shreyansh Jain Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 01:07:56 +0200 Message-ID: <11516402.N1J9uK5kvY@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190404130437.GA1355@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190404110215.14410-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20190404114818.21286-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20190404130437.GA1355@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] config: increase the num of rawdev to be 64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190404230756.CooKfpiy6LMT3o9KSFar_4oZ8JsX0GGPN_yLcYx3wyk@z> 04/04/2019 15:04, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:50:18AM +0000, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > The current value is 10, which is not sufficient for many use-cases. > > e.g. NXP LX2 with raw qdma devices can use 32-48 raw devices in some > > use-cases. So, making it to 64 to cover various cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Series applied, thanks