From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9C568FC for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:24:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b201so129096097wmb.0 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 01:24:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ffbaE6eqEs03DLZYEuUv1o4uffNJ/QBuG3Hkvstw6lI=; b=sEMTGzxq78hesUqvkZh0ToDnENtLhVEO5VdgBtdyEitWWKzs6HmIjZYOT4f7Wr6eli Sy57ljoVSPedwMkF5Btk0/4Mi0qo83NTfo00AdHc5KSt+kYKxMS+3v+D1kVezyHhgCHw Deb59OFF9ZGZevIrh45VIaWpMOItGEYKsybUg0YTZP/ZrsGAKWbqlfY3o6H/k3wx3+mc KWgwlXN9LjsJ7mcr+GJEghT6qY+cNg3CEEc8wqkw9Y/l40106wp5YB0/UsJKRoioQjSd Ux9OdQ8epfpnKedm5J87e94I3y0dY6QpuxczkYJFecVocHFlNXRdgNfnvPOzrXGnTWw8 0Mlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ffbaE6eqEs03DLZYEuUv1o4uffNJ/QBuG3Hkvstw6lI=; b=BWxxcSPJNUFurl4mXJhbHFYuKQFJjKqW1QAiIUMd/pgo9MnJNjexTxbs1aqwnvSFbd L7opW/b18r78DUahf6zRla7eAAHf5aleQGc+1H1Ujg39mBWbGccm8YbX/so4EF38xpaO xqspstGABEQGvxep+uzWs8nTyccCWhjIpvnPAawkr93yA3aNj8MRW7YlgW4oQsDVvrJ8 JVVlkYC0WQZFzNfBoEguOBdx4xMdG56RUaFtOSgNjLDE0+qwrCIK1SqBLvOVE/Q+AnwP pmreeFFqgrNdnVYy00AFCoDZey+qlMgzB9v0r34Xfk0+W2X0r9uYIdlkZ0lDEdPEk3wf J6mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkT7ABzSc6aGwBhSPkkiYMADb9VuNaGmlj5YmN2LnOn0uwLXUp5j590E7ITfZfarcTj X-Received: by 10.28.128.86 with SMTP id b83mr14307945wmd.40.1475569471139; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 01:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (172.17.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.17.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vs7sm2264191wjb.10.2016.10.04.01.24.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Oct 2016 01:24:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Bruce Richardson , Jianbo Liu , helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:24:27 +0200 Message-ID: <11619392.ICokHKcQb2@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160919162506.GL45548@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1472032425-16136-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <20160919162506.GL45548@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] i40e: vector poll-mode driver on ARM64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:24:31 -0000 2016-09-19 17:25, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:23:40PM +0530, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > This patch set is to implement i40e vector PMD on ARM64. > > For x86, vPMD is only reorganized, there should be no performance loss. > > > > Jianbo Liu (5): > > i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from vector driver > > i40e: implement vector PMD for ARM architecture > > i40e: enable i40e vector PMD on ARMv8a platform > > i40e: make vector driver filenames consistent > > maintainers: claim i40e vector PMD on ARM > > > Ping for comment/ack - especially from i40e maintainers. Why is there no review of these patches for acceleration on ARM?