From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA81A04F9; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:33:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A95330; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:33:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59279235 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:33:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576658027; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RRQ0rPCiA74F3Pwsxl/iS0wtbEpdGM4l8ftY8rPxG1w=; b=ZyjTPaV/GR0F5X+fhxAuGot6VbACqt1cyjA7TBn0n4S7w3IVgcX7A3dKewkESRXnDygEH1 gYSt/7IzgJ1xdP+gBVonv+MQqoMGi9PIttyJaOBY3+bbgFdb8U4tIzKER/odk/6UNMr0oe T20P4crCWE6mFDX7gCB4Zvop3FgYGwE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-299-hgqfn6_pO5-hgMfaIM1HRg-1; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:33:46 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7A6DBA5; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.61] (ovpn-117-61.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.61]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA56A5C28D; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:33:43 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eelco Chaudron" To: "Ye Xiaolong" Cc: "Zhang, Xiao" , dev@dpdk.org, "Xing, Beilei" , "Zhang, Qi Z" Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:33:41 +0100 Message-ID: <11CB6A5A-1E92-4C24-A546-4078C2C1B1EC@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191218025732.GS59123@intel.com> References: <20191119134431.13566.87940.stgit@netdev64> <20191218025732.GS59123@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-MC-Unique: hgqfn6_pO5-hgMfaIM1HRg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: always re-program promiscuous mode on VF interface X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thanks! On 18 Dec 2019, at 3:57, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 12/18, Zhang, Xiao wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Eelco Chaudron [mailto:echaudro@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:45 PM >>> To: Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z=20 >>> >>> Cc: Zhang, Xiao ; dev@dpdk.org >>> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: always re-program promiscuous mode on=20 >>> VF >>> interface >>> >>> During a kernel PF reset, this event is propagated to the VF. >>> The DPDK VF PMD will execute the reset task before the PF is done=20 >>> with his. This >>> results in the admin queue message not being responded to leaving=20 >>> the port in >>> "promiscuous" mode. >>> >>> This patch makes sure the promiscuous mode is configured=20 >>> independently of the >>> current admin state. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron >> >> Reviewed-by: Xiao Zhang > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel, Thanks.