From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/6] build: increase default of max lcores to 512
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:01:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11ad7af7-7500-4348-7bfa-7a69792f8242@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86CF0@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
On 17/11/2021 3:55 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
> My microphone was not working during the Techboard meeting, so here goes instead:
>
> Please consider if the default of max 128 assigned lcores suffices for the expected lifetime of the 21.11 LTS, or if the default should be bumped to 512 as suggested.
>
> @David Hunt, do you have idea about the memory cost of increasing from 128 to 512? This seems to be the primary objection.
>
> -Morten
Hi Morten,
I seem to recall that a simple increase from 128 to 512 cores would
result in an increased static memory footprint of 2.5MBs per
application, but there were additional patches in the opriginal patch
set that switch from static allocation to dynamic allocation reducing
this to a few hundred kilobytes. This was not deemed the best direction,
so we went with the improvement of informing the user more clearly on
how to use the command line syntax to use the physical core numbers
above 128 as lcores in your application.
I believe the thinking is that 128 lcores is plenty for a single
application, and if there is a case where more than that is needed (for
a single application), then the default can be over-ridden by changing
the max_lcores setting and recompiling.
Rgds,
Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-09 13:45 [dpdk-dev] build: Increase the default value of RTE_MAX_LCORE David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/6] build: increase default of max lcores to 512 David Hunt
2021-09-09 14:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 6:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 7:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 8:06 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 8:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-14 9:34 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 10:00 ` David Marchand
2021-09-14 11:07 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 11:29 ` David Marchand
2021-09-15 12:13 ` David Hunt
2021-11-17 15:55 ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-17 19:01 ` David Hunt [this message]
2021-09-15 12:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: add additional info if lcore exceeds max cores David Hunt
2021-09-16 12:34 ` David Marchand
2021-09-20 9:30 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list too long David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-21 12:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 11:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 12:04 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:16 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-21 15:10 ` David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:12 ` David Marchand
2021-09-23 10:21 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Marchand
2021-09-23 9:47 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-11-02 17:45 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 10:27 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 10:29 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 13:30 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-11-05 10:50 ` David Marchand
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of acpi lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of pstate lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of cppc lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of channels David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/6] lib/power: switch empty poll to max cores config David Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11ad7af7-7500-4348-7bfa-7a69792f8242@intel.com \
--to=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).