From: "Ariel Otilibili-Anieli" <otilibil@eurecom.fr>
To: "Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, chenbox@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix VDUSE devices registration
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 18:34:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11eea5-679d0980-397-2b71eb40@59612471> (raw)
Hello Maxime,
On Friday, January 31, 2025 14:09 CET, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes a regression in vhost_driver_register()
> causing VDUSE devices registration to fail systematically
> because the return value was initialized to -1 and not
> changed later on for this type of devices.
>
> Fixes: 4d2aa150769b ("vhost: remove check around mutex init")
Thanks for the heads up. I indeed committed 4d2aa150769b ("vhost: remove check around mutex init"); and it contained a hunk for vhost_driver_register().
I applied this patch against the tip of the main; from what I saw, there is no overlap with 4d2aa150769b ("vhost: remove check around mutex init").
It looks 4d2aa150769b ("vhost: remove check around mutex init") came up first, because I was the last person who edited the file.
The tags should be rather these ones:
Fixes: 0adb8eccc6a6 ("vhost: add VDUSE device creation and destruction")
Fixes: 78b2e3bae1af ("vhost: fix initialization")
Fixes: 64ab701c3d1e ("vhost: add vhost-user client mode")
Fixes: 8f972312b8f4 ("vhost: support vhost-user")
Does my reasoning make sense? Let me know.
:) For my understanding; now that 4d2aa150769b ("vhost: remove check around mutex init") needs a fix, is there a way by which I could have detect the regression?
Your help will be much appreciated,
Ariel
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 17:34 Ariel Otilibili-Anieli [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-31 13:09 Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11eea5-679d0980-397-2b71eb40@59612471 \
--to=otilibil@eurecom.fr \
--cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).