From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ED745C7A; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:32:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B7740EDC; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:32:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BFC40E0C for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:32:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30F411400F4; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:32:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:32:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1731317552; x=1731403952; bh=WpFw7BHTQbX4luzAI3KPmek2oy7hkbBrP2aWvfSjXNk=; b= LStiz/OlGBX/Kf6pzfNOPC3WKZyPW8nAZHHvTKl4YChxz/7amgp4DUua/yf4O4hs 7yOyW3cL55f+hzhb5WghJIFja2tHYAZ+ryC7UoOHFiFd39zmM3+3MS61GYtQ6xqn 6TjPops6iL45C5vZN8Q64ZyyGYnT7U09a5iV7FDlMqoEpqHeMhP8TkH+GB+RUuOx HcRn/Q+6M0Geres9YGWekf+mVCTsoIdkKUGqzo8+qRaQThUZWn4DhUbwes3JB21b l+7A+9U+JL9bSX+qqZX+yFyRsd0LYRLU2qgh9XN4HgkvIYKY/qLANYClVuA96zPC gaYUrueUhlqilJsn9xqtng== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1731317552; x= 1731403952; bh=WpFw7BHTQbX4luzAI3KPmek2oy7hkbBrP2aWvfSjXNk=; b=e v27tOzp6kK54Y5t1O1iuYCKnUusz2CH6gAOpp8EJ2mH5P7oQ/ak5DXKzVTGkWd/y rEHvinCwefY55jqQ++sE9G3MnE5f6xkfGZ1sTmZFfiVkup/d4YDF58Ue0CHA04pk I0z7PiqN95fnLt4Qa/7Mj7cQq80Pzb7KXGudyIwQDv+X8FLmaV1+w3sr+7kLYq6T 1zu76cVF6tlKmtL2Ss4zug2h95L6vpb7CoiAz5DMb0GkMt/n0Kzx6i3pxTj8+0pY LphkUl/TGaXUeTP4UWPmuqKY5Ce0fxUJCq0VtDMVMzv9SvBoIpp4z0rVnmvnlNU7 1XG1+o+9mWLnr13+adPiw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddvgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecu hfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlh honhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeduveehieevuddutdevfffgtdegkeeu veejffejgedtgeegkefgvdeugfefkeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthdpnhgs pghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtvghphh gvnhesnhgvthifohhrkhhplhhumhgsvghrrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghdrshhinhhg hhesnhigphdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsrggthhhinhdrshgrgigvnhgrsehoshhsrd hngihprdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohephhgvmhgrnhhtrdgrghhrrgifrghlsehngihprdgt ohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhesughpughkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:32:31 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger , Gagandeep Singh , Sachin Saxena , Hemant Agrawal Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: Bus scan is too chatty Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:32:28 +0100 Message-ID: <12313176.VV5PYv0bhD@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20241110111750.015ac026@hermes.local> References: <20241110111750.015ac026@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 10/11/2024 20:17, Stephen Hemminger: > DPDK EAL needs to be less verbose for non-existent buses. > Most users won't have embedded devices, and messages like: > > EAL: Scan for (fslmc) bus failed. > > will be confusing. When merging the recent fslmc patches, I've reduced the verbosity of some fslmc logs appearing at the cleanup stage. This log is from EAL because fslmc scan fails. It should not return an error if there is no bus or no environment variable. Sachin, Hemant, please could you fix it?