Re: [dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2016-06-06 19:49, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> > > Developers submitting fixes to the mainline should also CC the maintainer so
> > > that they can evaluate the patch. A <stable@dpdk.org> email address could be
> > > provided for this so that it can be included as a CC in the commit messages
> > > and documented in the Code Contribution Guidelines.
> > 
> > Why?
> > We must avoid putting too much restrictions on the contributors.
> 
> This is actually requested by me, in a behaviour similar to Linux
> kernel community takes. Here is the thing, the developer normally
> knows better than a generic maintainer (assume it's me) that a patch
> applies to stable branch or not. This is especially true for DPDK,
> since we ask the developer to note down the bug commit by adding a
> fix line.
> 
> It wouldn't be a burden for an active contributor, as CCing to related
> people (including right mailing list) is a good habit they already
> have.  For some one-time contributors, it's okay that they don't know
> and follow it.
> 
> In such case, I guess we need the help from the related subsystem
> maintainer: if it's a good bug fix that applies to stable branch,
> and the contributor forgot to make a explicit cc to stable mailing
> list, the subsystem maintainer should forward or ask him to forward
> to stable mailing list.
> 
> The reason I'm asking is that as a generic maintainer, there is
> simply no such energy to keep an eye on all patches: you have to
> be aware of that we have thoughts of email per month from dpdk dev
> mailing list: the number of last month is 1808.
> 
> Doing so would allow one person maintain several stable tree
> be possible.
> 
> For more info, you could check linux/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.

Makes sense to CC stable@dpdk.org list (must be created).

Why put a CC tag in the commit? For automatic processing?
Maybe it is too early to run before walking ;)