From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3ACA0353; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:32:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F513271; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:32:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C1923D for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:32:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F4E592; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:32:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:32:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=8r2oxTDRVtJZPEwlCh7OvYh53uDATQN03pYzT0jfCH0=; b=Eo5xJB9EhEV7 a4Bdpkl8MAUw7DKWwOQ1Br/ybqVal8+HMMmtzgsxeld29+7aX2Auy3CBZk5oYYuC WNdAGC5S2susgsz/R1Kr1D0oFchsPEy113aOWbdvt4KararQAWbxEuUEINDsWzPc LYmK8NBvfTsJvK40dnz1oD6jHx1iRGs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=8r2oxTDRVtJZPEwlCh7OvYh53uDATQN03pYzT0jfC H0=; b=xpT/Tk6raXg4PqCrrPq0u6xZHqtqYGv1G15Y9tWvgFZN7PUEJiyqrZSJG PejhIchVz3gaWOtwuAd+JiRSL6Nqhhd4vdzAchSEblAkstFKa8wW8TGEjGPdw0pP 1vyjTxRfrXrGyo1n0RFrdxbFMHZIJ+0xtD43fBIxclA43GxYleM4xR5v4Oq9Eh6K bSYQ1TVFarBbBviNgnWC2grolYwdJPpMqnP3HM5eLgYmESBy4rO71agc4fElKJVr yNU+qAqVH4frWqeg9KfT3oYSTpsq2b2oHFxvjBaHt9V30pbgvqDNgrw1ciQT7dUX oerzflUyPSwhmygG2Tov0E/3V6iBw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudegkedgtdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2F7880062; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:32:43 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Shahaf Shuler , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: <13010452.zfGL6P0G4r@xps> In-Reply-To: <20191118100247.74241-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> References: <20191118100247.74241-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: extend pktmbuf pool private structure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/11/2019 11:02, Shahaf Shuler: > struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private { > uint16_t mbuf_data_room_size; /**< Size of data space in each mbuf. */ > uint16_t mbuf_priv_size; /**< Size of private area in each mbuf. */ > + uint32_t reserved; /**< reserved for future use. */ Maybe simpler to give the future name "flags" and keep the comment "reserved for future use". Olivier, what do you think?