From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Gabriel Ganne <gabriel.ganne@6wind.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
thierry.herbelot@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] meson: remove unnecessary explicit link to libpcap
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:38:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13049033.jPmt81Ii10@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326082223.1398-1-gabriel.ganne@6wind.com>
Thank you, the fix looks good.
I would like to improve the explanation.
If I understand the issue, the title should be
"build: remove redundant libpcap link"
26/03/2021 09:22, Gabriel Ganne:
> libpcap is already found and registered as a dependency by meson, and
> the dependency is already correctly used in librte_port. This line is
> just unnecessary.
To be precise, the pcap PMD and the librte_port both declare their
dependency to libpcap with a line "ext_deps += pcap_dep"
and meson automatically adds this dependency to the pkg-config file
in the private section for static builds.
That's why it is not needed to add the dependency explicitly
in dpdk_extra_ldflags (involved in static build with pkg-config).
> It also has the side effect of messing with the meson link line: dpdk
Which "link line"?
> link will be declared twice: manually and then through pkg-config. If
What is "manually"?
> you configure meson to prefer static linking over dynamic, this will
No need to configure meson for that. Static linking can be tested with
make in an example. Please avoid messing with meson explanation
for application linking, it is already complicate enough :)
> cause the build to fail on librte_port, since the pcap deps are not yet
> seen by the linker.
Sorry it is not clear to me.
I think it would help to see a before/after effect on the link command.
Something like:
before:
Libs.private: -lpcap
Requires.private: libpcap
after:
Libs.private:
Requires.private: libpcap
[...]
> - dpdk_extra_ldflags += '-lpcap'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 8:22 Gabriel Ganne
2021-03-26 9:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-04 0:05 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-08 22:38 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-09 8:31 ` Gabriel Ganne
2021-04-09 9:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13049033.jPmt81Ii10@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gabriel.ganne@6wind.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thierry.herbelot@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).