From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:21:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307ba36-7b4a-e465-d055-b4ad976adea1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200608051658.144417-2-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Hi Ruifeng,
Thanks for patches, see comments below
On 08/06/2020 06:16, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> Currently, the tbl8 group is freed even though the readers might be
> using the tbl8 group entries. The freed tbl8 group can be reallocated
> quickly. This results in incorrect lookup results.
>
> RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaim.
> Refer to RCU documentation to understand various aspects of
> integrating RCU library into other libraries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst | 32 ++++++++
> lib/librte_lpm/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/librte_lpm/meson.build | 1 +
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 59 ++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map | 6 ++
> 6 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> index 1609a57d0..7cc99044a 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> @@ -145,6 +145,38 @@ depending on whether we need to move to the next table or not.
> Prefix expansion is one of the keys of this algorithm,
> since it improves the speed dramatically by adding redundancy.
>
> +Deletion
> +~~~~~~~~
> +
> +When deleting a rule, a replacement rule is searched for. Replacement rule is an existing rule that has
> +the longest prefix match with the rule to be deleted, but has smaller depth.
> +
> +If a replacement rule is found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries are updated to have the same depth and next hop
> +value with the replacement rule.
> +
> +If no replacement rule can be found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries will be cleared.
> +
> +Prefix expansion is performed if the rule's depth is not exactly 24 bits or 32 bits.
> +
> +After deleting a rule, a group of tbl8s that belongs to the same tbl24 entry are freed in following cases:
> +
> +* All tbl8s in the group are empty .
> +
> +* All tbl8s in the group have the same values and with depth no greater than 24.
> +
> +Free of tbl8s have different behaviors:
> +
> +* If RCU is not used, tbl8s are cleared and reclaimed immediately.
> +
> +* If RCU is used, tbl8s are reclaimed when readers are in quiescent state.
> +
> +When the LPM is not using RCU, tbl8 group can be freed immediately even though the readers might be using
> +the tbl8 group entries. This might result in incorrect lookup results.
> +
> +RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaimation. Application has certain responsibilities
> +while using this feature. Please refer to resource reclaimation framework of :ref:`RCU library <RCU_Library>`
> +for more details.
> +
> Lookup
> ~~~~~~
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> index d682785b6..6f06c5c03 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIB = librte_lpm.a
>
> CFLAGS += -O3
> CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS) -I$(SRCDIR)
> -LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_hash
> +LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_hash -lrte_rcu
>
> EXPORT_MAP := rte_lpm_version.map
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> index 021ac6d8d..6cfc083c5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ headers = files('rte_lpm.h', 'rte_lpm6.h')
> # without worrying about which architecture we actually need
> headers += files('rte_lpm_altivec.h', 'rte_lpm_neon.h', 'rte_lpm_sse.h')
> deps += ['hash']
> +deps += ['rcu']
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> index 38ab512a4..30f541179 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> */
>
> #include <string.h>
> @@ -246,12 +247,85 @@ rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
>
> rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
>
> + if (lpm->dq)
> + rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_delete(lpm->dq);
> rte_free(lpm->tbl8);
> rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl);
> rte_free(lpm);
> rte_free(te);
> }
>
> +static void
> +__lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource(void *p, void *data, unsigned int n)
> +{
> + struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0};
> + uint32_t tbl8_group_index = *(uint32_t *)data;
> + struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8 = (struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *)p;
> +
> + RTE_SET_USED(n);
> + /* Set tbl8 group invalid */
> + __atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_index], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +}
> +
> +/* Associate QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> + */
> +int
> +rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq)
> +{
> + char rcu_dq_name[RTE_RCU_QSBR_DQ_NAMESIZE];
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_parameters params = {0};
> +
> + if ((lpm == NULL) || (cfg == NULL)) {
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (lpm->v) {
> + rte_errno = EEXIST;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> + /* No other things to do. */
> + } else if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> + /* Init QSBR defer queue. */
> + snprintf(rcu_dq_name, sizeof(rcu_dq_name),
> + "LPM_RCU_%s", lpm->name);
> + params.name = rcu_dq_name;
> + params.size = cfg->dq_size;
> + if (params.size == 0)
> + params.size = lpm->number_tbl8s;
> + params.trigger_reclaim_limit = cfg->reclaim_thd;
> + if (params.trigger_reclaim_limit == 0)
This makes it impossible for a user to configure reclamation triggering
with every call. Should we allow it?
> + params.trigger_reclaim_limit =
> + RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD;
> + params.max_reclaim_size = cfg->reclaim_max;
> + if (params.max_reclaim_size == 0)
> + params.max_reclaim_size = RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX;
> + params.esize = sizeof(uint32_t); /* tbl8 group index */
> + params.free_fn = __lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource;
> + params.p = lpm->tbl8;
I think it's better to pass the LPM pointer here rather than tbl8, for
example, in case we decide to add some counters in the future
> + params.v = cfg->v;
> + lpm->dq = rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_create(¶ms);
> + if (lpm->dq == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, LPM,
> + "LPM QS defer queue creation failed\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + if (dq)
> + *dq = lpm->dq;
> + } else {
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + return 1;
> + }
> + lpm->rcu_mode = cfg->mode;
> + lpm->v = cfg->v;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Adds a rule to the rule table.
> *
> @@ -394,14 +468,15 @@ rule_find(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth)
> * Find, clean and allocate a tbl8.
> */
> static int32_t
> -tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> +_tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> {
> uint32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8_entry;
>
> /* Scan through tbl8 to find a free (i.e. INVALID) tbl8 group. */
> - for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> - tbl8_entry = &tbl8[group_idx * RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> + for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < lpm->number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> + tbl8_entry = &lpm->tbl8[group_idx *
> + RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> /* If a free tbl8 group is found clean it and set as VALID. */
> if (!tbl8_entry->valid_group) {
> struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
> @@ -427,14 +502,40 @@ tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
>
> +static int32_t
> +tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> +{
> + int32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> +
> + group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> + if ((group_idx < 0) && (lpm->dq != NULL)) {
I think (group_idx == -ENOSPC) will be safer
> + /* If there are no tbl8 groups try to reclaim one. */
> + if (rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(lpm->dq, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL) == 0)
> + group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
I'm not really happy with this approach. _tbl8_alloc() produces linear
scan through the memory to find a free group_idx and it is the slowest
part of rte_lpm_add().
Here after reclamation of some group index we need to rescan a memory
again to find it. It would be great if there will be some way to return
reclaimed elements. Or just to dequeue elements from dq and reclaim them
manually.
> + }
> +
> + return group_idx;
> +}
> +
> static void
> -tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t tbl8_group_start)
> +tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t tbl8_group_start)
> {
> - /* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0};
>
> - __atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_start], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> - __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + if (!lpm->v) {
> + /* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> + __atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> + /* Wait for quiescent state change. */
> + rte_rcu_qsbr_synchronize(lpm->v, RTE_QSBR_THRID_INVALID);
> + /* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> + __atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> + /* Push into QSBR defer queue. */
> + rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue(lpm->dq, (void *)&tbl8_group_start);
> + }
> }
>
> static __rte_noinline int32_t
> @@ -523,7 +624,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
>
> if (!lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid) {
> /* Search for a free tbl8 group. */
> - tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm->number_tbl8s);
> + tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
>
> /* Check tbl8 allocation was successful. */
> if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> @@ -569,7 +670,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
> } /* If valid entry but not extended calculate the index into Table8. */
> else if (lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid_group == 0) {
> /* Search for free tbl8 group. */
> - tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm->number_tbl8s);
> + tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
>
> if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> return tbl8_group_index;
> @@ -977,7 +1078,7 @@ delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
> */
> lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid = 0;
> __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> - tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> + tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> } else if (tbl8_recycle_index > -1) {
> /* Update tbl24 entry. */
> struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl24_entry = {
> @@ -993,7 +1094,7 @@ delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked,
> __atomic_store(&lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index], &new_tbl24_entry,
> __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> - tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> + tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> }
> #undef group_idx
> return 0;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> index b9d49ac87..8c054509a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> */
>
> #ifndef _RTE_LPM_H_
> @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <rte_memory.h>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> #include <rte_vect.h>
> +#include <rte_rcu_qsbr.h>
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> @@ -62,6 +64,17 @@ extern "C" {
> /** Bitmask used to indicate successful lookup */
> #define RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS 0x01000000
>
> +/** @internal Default threshold to trigger RCU defer queue reclaimation. */
> +#define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD 32
> +
> +/** @internal Default RCU defer queue entries to reclaim in one go. */
> +#define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX 16
> +
> +/* Create defer queue for reclaim. */
> +#define RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ 0
> +/* Use blocking mode reclaim. No defer queue created. */
> +#define RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC 0x01
using enums instead of defines?
> +
> #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> /** @internal Tbl24 entry structure. */
> __extension__
> @@ -130,6 +143,28 @@ struct rte_lpm {
> __rte_cache_aligned; /**< LPM tbl24 table. */
> struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8; /**< LPM tbl8 table. */
> struct rte_lpm_rule *rules_tbl; /**< LPM rules. */
> +
> + /* RCU config. */
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v; /* RCU QSBR variable. */
> + uint32_t rcu_mode; /* Blocking, defer queue. */
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq; /* RCU QSBR defer queue. */
> +};
> +
> +/** LPM RCU QSBR configuration structure. */
> +struct rte_lpm_rcu_config {
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v; /* RCU QSBR variable. */
> + /* Mode of RCU QSBR. RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_xxx
> + * '0' for default: create defer queue for reclaim.
> + */
> + uint32_t mode;
> + /* RCU defer queue size. default: lpm->number_tbl8s. */
> + uint32_t dq_size;
> + uint32_t reclaim_thd; /* Threshold to trigger auto reclaim.
> + * default: RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_TRHD.
> + */
> + uint32_t reclaim_max; /* Max entries to reclaim in one go.
> + * default: RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX.
> + */
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -179,6 +214,30 @@ rte_lpm_find_existing(const char *name);
> void
> rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm);
>
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> + *
> + * Associate RCU QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> + *
> + * @param lpm
> + * the lpm object to add RCU QSBR
> + * @param cfg
> + * RCU QSBR configuration
> + * @param dq
> + * handler of created RCU QSBR defer queue
> + * @return
> + * On success - 0
> + * On error - 1 with error code set in rte_errno.
> + * Possible rte_errno codes are:
> + * - EINVAL - invalid pointer
> + * - EEXIST - already added QSBR
> + * - ENOMEM - memory allocation failure
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
> + struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq);
> +
> /**
> * Add a rule to the LPM table.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> index 500f58b80..bfccd7eac 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> @@ -21,3 +21,9 @@ DPDK_20.0 {
>
> local: *;
> };
> +
> +EXPERIMENTAL {
> + global:
> +
> + rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add;
> +};
--
Regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23 1:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26 5:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:22 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 4:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 5:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14 4:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 6:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13 3:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18 3:47 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20 8:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 8:42 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 8:51 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 9:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:25 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09 3:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:36 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18 3:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03 9:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir [this message]
2020-06-22 5:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23 4:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56 ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03 7:43 ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49 ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307ba36-7b4a-e465-d055-b4ad976adea1@intel.com \
--to=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).