From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7000C2170 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 22:53:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f126so50391227wma.1 for ; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jwCcfftTrQvca/sriIp/Z8QCq0HJUSynOchHzwpw5Kk=; b=dB3BS0mgksHHxgDL1ol/PS78scsuAfOHnkgBi2dw9g2TRvTX+gKbK/LlzBmScFlvc6 /8+QVhe39fSmct5nxAw+/2A2zDx8WPjPKjSZXCk9mCylB1xceRk7qHm4HSQ9IqL4+zrb Wqf5+AeaGlgbnZaR3+q4N7mv/WEMnE65ihZfO87GLRrGY/Au3S0LSWEVOEWFgSlZ3GAd 8m8dcxyy2FQRnkbQSnCKVN9LoYTc+UtqCLqgMzDTG/bBcd356iSQuKB5JhgkWit9aHML mlpAHU4cbYwQsmjpNlZJi78MjEDdFjINhdU+U+2qcipFsboWnJI1s7hS4CtgmYryG35i UsRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jwCcfftTrQvca/sriIp/Z8QCq0HJUSynOchHzwpw5Kk=; b=ZSbtA2O4fc9zkIdD1Oh/UKdP7GVPKYLBmyTPZ8rIPnKcjhLItgJuetav+B7aLiwZOW +j7tr0jv0EV1F4A9yc7E5kl6PJ1WYGjUbjNRQfQRc62X+lYeQAL3FVY3TqR1BtEbZrSs Tp4/UHILMLhBJ/4oDGXJS/F6O5gkaSSxwbxtDgbzSa1xnb+KLeBkqCGUsIleXs5742JV xazeAchllEYl957PfhBnBVHbVMWXOnK9pjb3gzxjE9wBdXeI+Utu9OLIf7BKhV+n/g9W VWVsViTJtzs5e7kjNDwbpEaQF1IrBrH0cT2qnnWzVWDHtP1Kva2tS1CXwrDwGsObTiLq rpKw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIMPllK7esmEk1X3PMHHMRGDLKtazq3T55OpgHot7CpGy+2IpOhtdSA10ZXEtn9IPLB X-Received: by 10.194.135.197 with SMTP id pu5mr10836290wjb.135.1468097601244; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm470742wjy.18.2016.07.09.13.53.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:53:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: gowrishankar Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chao Zhu , Bruce Richardson , Konstantin Ananyev , Cristian Dumitrescu , pradeep@us.ibm.com Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 22:53:19 +0200 Message-ID: <13354717.T3ZIX32DYy@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <57810C81.90807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1467860276-22848-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2151416.pAYsFeuZ97@xps13> <57810C81.90807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] config: enable lpm, port, table, pipeline, acl, sched libraries for ppc64le X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 20:53:21 -0000 2016-07-09 20:08, gowrishankar: > Hi Thomas, > > On Friday 08 July 2016 06:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The comment and these lines can be removed and rely on default > > enabling in config/common_base. I suggest to enable (remove disabling) > > a feature at a time in the patch fixing the feature for PPC. > > Sure. So, do you suggest to send individual patchset (or patch) for each > feature being enabled, one by one ?. No, my comment was about dropping the patch #1 and update following patches. Example: in the patch fixing LPM, you can remove the line disabling LPM in the config file.