DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce action context APIs
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:18:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13482208.h4NtUrPqza@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR12MB2909FE144AADF25350C4CBFFD0769@MN2PR12MB2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

06/04/2021 13:02, Bing Zhao:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > 06/04/2021 11:07, Bing Zhao:
> > > From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> > > > On 3/17/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 17/03/2021 08:59, Bing Zhao:
> > > > >> The new functions rte_flow_action_ctx* that were added will
> > > > replace
> > > > >> the curret shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*.
> > > > >>   - rte_flow_shared_action_create
> > > > >>   - rte_flow_shared_action_destroy
> > > > >>   - rte_flow_shared_action_update
> > > > >>   - rte_flow_shared_action_query
> > > > >>   + rte_flow_action_ctx_create
> > > > >>   + rte_flow_action_ctx_destroy
> > > > >>   + rte_flow_action_ctx_update
> > > > >>   + rte_flow_action_ctx_query
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When creating a action context, it could be shared among
> > > > different
> > > > >> flows or different ports. Or it could also be used by a
> > single
> > > > flow.
> > > > >> The name "shared" is improper in a sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it the only reason for the change?
> > > > > I better understand "shared" even if it is sometimes not
> > shared.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > >
> > > In another email, I explained the change a bit more. Please check
> > and give comments, thank you all.
> > 
> > Any link to this email from inbox.dpdk.org?
> 
> The link is here.
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/MN2PR12MB29097FE55676D5D389D86C46D0769@MN2PR12MB2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/
> 
> > 
> > Please explain here the naming reason.
> > 
> 
> The naming reasons are listed below:
> 1. The "shared_action*" is incorrect or improper naming of the interface.
> 2. The "_update" interface needs to be changed to support the partial updating capability.
> 3. Since we need to modify the update interface, this is a chance to change the improper *experimental* interfaces naming to make them more proper.

It does not explain why "action_ctx" is a better name than "shared_action".




  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1615967952-228321-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com>
2021-03-17  8:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-17 16:10   ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 14:59     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-06  9:05       ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 14:54   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-06  9:07     ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-06  9:48       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-06 11:02         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-06 12:18           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-07  3:16         ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-07  6:11           ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-08 14:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-09  3:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-12 19:42       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13  1:26         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-13 14:00           ` Ori Kam
2021-04-13 12:36       ` Andrey Vesnovaty
2021-04-15 13:55       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-15 14:10         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 16:02           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-10 14:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] app/test-pmd: change to indirect action command Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] doc: update user guide for indirect action Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 14:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: adaption to indirect action API Bing Zhao
2021-04-12 19:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Change shared action API to action handle API Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13  1:22       ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-13  7:23         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13  7:24           ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/1] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 15:56       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-15 17:59       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-16  6:58         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16  7:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 15:00           ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-16 17:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/1] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 12:26       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 15:05         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/1] Change shared action API to action handle API Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:38     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] ethdev: introduce indirect action APIs Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:50       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 15:09         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13482208.h4NtUrPqza@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).