From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B622D2BD5; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5252021DFB; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 05:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 05:35:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ivJJEvoZBPyhLRMw7CkkWhcO/U /8WNJtYH49nkvS/yQ=; b=Y+22ZlVgOx0P5iI3OMslyYU78L1zI+LBQ1fANagn4m eW1DUD3prPpBTWv6wuAYMepqPXDbHZcz8PW1lPiBpFWcgkZHmK1jbM0LVGVAs0Ow GUgmGV1LeEJ8NF0GLsRXd/lrWIHmBVbdytVtu+8JjrBJxZNrcb3sdVkTsNAAAGr0 E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ivJJEv oZBPyhLRMw7CkkWhcO/U/8WNJtYH49nkvS/yQ=; b=fqTO+E7uYN7OE1XYlYziCq q9QOeCYlLk2O7ugcpEoKDGu2nXQplqrN28hlPe1CKNPfvmn1XyB30zNVxC4dZp5D 4mYXCmW1KUYOAfvgcVtapO9ENe2x45qxQqyP1GyXD40tevdO88feBibXkFh6gOrU 0SC8iaU+ctgBYGSa1dnzEGA6YELX37CP7KSw+PkQuC4wjVnhtVvOdpj2CzU81r+k J2Jt+Wal3yMC6MutKpSaflQw2Q8N3xpI/IwEjl2onODrTyoBH1acR/6VlGTTfkfc 83ESmPD3TovQuDcppqQsZBP/T5aoQ9Uzx/HYJ5p1CPJp1wt6oQ2rs63FpTEBOc6A == X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0C909102A0; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 05:35:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Zhang, Qi Z" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Eads, Gage" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "stable@dpdk.org" Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:35:49 +0200 Message-ID: <13603387.Rn1UgLQFMC@xps> In-Reply-To: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E44718085@fmsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20180827122732.5531-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <20180903085022.45183-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E44718085@fmsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus/vdev: fix wrong error log on secondary device scan X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 09:35:52 -0000 > > When a secondary process handles VDEV_SCAN_ONE mp action, it is possible > > the device is already be inserted. This happens when we have multiple secondary > > processes which cause multiple broadcasts from primary during > > bus->scan. So we don't need to log any error for -EEXIST. > > > > Bugzilla ID: 84 > > Fixes: cdb068f031c6 ("bus/vdev: scan by multi-process channel") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Reported-by: Eads Gage > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang > Acked-by: Gage Eads Applied, thanks