From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ED6A0522; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F861DA76; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6211DA71; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:12:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1721580116; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 05:12:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:12:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= AAUoA5enHk/ApwKwCj0nUt8D/DESGlbw3I5VBrnY/i4=; b=tIjRE5CS75kp7ZWS GRx3BsfjUTpxX7jsFr7vixa75Rucz+ZICyvlWpp/DlktOhaycTQwdIB5cRyRuIFN X0eSrChKm5xxLlg8Z3eRbm35uFJGo7t2FDUgS98Vu61yrYRsVgMemKA9JkHs6lVa jLje8tLZZq4ZsAHNB90FIRBCLIZbNVGpW0jaQchytxaDUZfSetd7MxZ2AdbBgcSl K9E6k0pBE8mHxgTvjByOShK8ApOlBFfa/du5rbby5LwHw0uXUb4ZnjYMJ2CuuZCe DmSjt5c4vh4A4CWVG0mnpj9hv87JSHKp9GKHdi0kMInmm2mWZ+Z0WU9E4ff35ubW 82MTwA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=AAUoA5enHk/ApwKwCj0nUt8D/DESGlbw3I5VBrnY/ i4=; b=RuRW9b+pq7gt6dnZiYOkk0oMG5cNed7pMPyGikOs3QOe0pgrzQGf4675S fGlA+KoLHRJ1mV+U4Lx7ImbDQqrDvyZbjAFeGUQ5H+EM0XuOYwjoSSIfMMvniHd+ hG3bn4YjlNaOvM6FaZ98n7cOwl08I73x6SXQLXV8pJgEOyL3M4tF9sgEvF6VFZr0 XkKTYdqPKlYLFrN9f5aVg8AtRRTRNxHYMtvnd94LT3sep2/QTejl48t9S4DgVGrT C+L4+fQv51L/tICF9clsN8QywUi3rCTqetIqnJfUkgwLKWYDtKsoLDZVCFN06buK JmvF8aJX+1H0RIapI33+exfVIiO4g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrtdeigddufecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 897253280064; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 05:11:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Owen Hilyard Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, matan@mellanox.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jerinj@marvell.com, suanmingm@mellanox.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com, pbhagavatula@marvell.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, dekelp@mellanox.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mk@semihalf.com, viacheslavo@mellanox.com Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 11:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: <13850469.gVNdlFUnev@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Multicast MAC Filter Test Case X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/07/2020 15:26, Owen Hilyard: > Hello Everyone, > > I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions regarding testing the > multicast mac filter. My current plan is to send a frame and check it's not > received, then add the multicast address to the filter and send another > frame, checking that it is received. Suggestions of other test cases for > this feature are also welcome. You can check that unicast is still working. You can check bradcast behaviour. You can test different ranges and flags of multicast addresses. I wonder which kind of environment or configuration change could have a side effect on multicast. Any ideas about more complex test cases?