From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C0646F67; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:50:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8AE4065C; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:50:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.148]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700DF402D8 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:50:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2F71D00183; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:50:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1758732653; x=1758819053; bh=DvBEDDmD7aqGbBcMP705CPGFDIr1ELHpCvaHaHr8H5U=; b= bfM/2YiXPMK92Gk/ohLNeZIMiEc5zYoU7xwkMRm4+6TXhwJ8W2g5GX7mC26+9j0H /VA1+t5t7ZlIbSQOw7SYXVqbIWeOoD0xZSQ694xN5hFYrZu5C7iWlwC4bNF74A/t sXEgxwObjhXoCcFMKS9NR42Z6GHuDSi4MmWoiINitLZTkMvVcwY9ffTELSKJFk2m bfT8SyK+c/1Yarnf2Oqu6psdm8dZd2ewL/7/mywSHKFH5y3Q0tuwEcbU7EdfmhfJ eVIJ23MDYVVyDbwAjErT6ZS8YY91ZxpX4JjUq+tGk+JnP4W9vlZ/HtQLyhbpjHeM 9jbdZcBbPvvnZZ6+/fVuUA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1758732653; x= 1758819053; bh=DvBEDDmD7aqGbBcMP705CPGFDIr1ELHpCvaHaHr8H5U=; b=X Oz50/IwIcT5dgdd/2LrjY7F5M+VneiFm1011ke8AOVhRrubnVGT7er0d20OHdGyO wVJrtNLIdqJW5IiNr9/rTCMNIGx/02vJtjjlnLsHkKU7LMzPeVtm8qUqHciKcp2L A8C80wS+FgNe0OzHeavERLvbCDns9XrPUDo3361Suze5Dx5irzYPbW7fV4xqRp7Z rEuS5Y5sSA6kGwJrjhwpAIcGZl8DHPo+hMSxc5cEiLdgekF+06W6AMo/VQ2fTqXW bI34MgvZmXdkGUebfmfIEHvt7Y71vvrRDa8SoajyePixUO219UKtW4s28mR1fagj Heh/CgyzjoEkzFYl0kNZw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdeigedufecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttd dtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejudevheeiveduuddtveffgf dtgeekueevjeffjeegtdeggeekgfdvuefgfeekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvg htpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegu vghvseguphgukhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegsrhhutggvrdhrihgthhgrrhgushhonh esihhnthgvlhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] lib: fix AVX2 checks and macro exposure Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <13998226.VsHLxoZxqI@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20250924154641.2684705-1-thomas@monjalon.net> References: <20250918073135.1273767-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20250924154641.2684705-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 24/09/2025 17:43, Thomas Monjalon: > I've found the AVX2 function is not used in efd library. > Then I tried to make AVX2 compilation simpler in efd and member libraries. > > While at it, I've hidden a macro which was wrongly exported in the API > without having a correct prefix. > > The v3 does not have the patches removing build-time checks: > - efd: remove AVX2 build-time check > - member: remove AVX2 build-time checks > because I'm not sure losing inlining for cleanup is worth. > > Thomas Monjalon (2): > efd: fix AVX2 support > member: hide internal macro Applied The 2 other patches from v2 could be reconsidered later if we measure that the performance hit is neglictible. I probably won't work on it, so I let it to anyone interested.