From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76051A0A02; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:14:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAF4141194; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:14:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8DB14118D for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:14:42 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: iQMbgZBWMGznAhnNODOoKa1NojRzPXmTPhB/zsAc/46NOsPsxtf4lljlqI375+rpcZoMx6cIcn 14GvojH1FHjg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9863"; a="174839970" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,347,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="174839970" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2021 03:14:41 -0800 IronPort-SDR: e46ILvhBcWLYBhDIwjngv/l2qhRZxkadfvFZnJAXuFYTKeu9ll2AIdMxl9sxDrPVTfk9KuOTPf SsVYQW15fLxw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,347,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="364192969" Received: from vmedvedk-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.29.135]) ([10.252.29.135]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2021 03:14:39 -0800 To: Ruifeng Wang , Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com References: <20210108082127.1061538-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20210114065926.1200855-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20210114065926.1200855-5-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" Message-ID: <13f682fa-191f-ade5-1d42-2e5bd013a20b@intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:14:36 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210114065926.1200855-5-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: improve coverage on tbl8 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 14/01/2021 06:59, Ruifeng Wang wrote: > Existing test cases create 256 tbl8 groups for testing. The number covers > only 8 bit next_hop/group field. Since the next_hop/group field had been > extended to 24-bits, creating more than 256 groups in tests can improve > the coverage. > > Coverage was not expanded to reach the max supported group number, because > it would take too much time to run for this fast-test. > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > Tested-by: David Christensen > Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin > --- > v2: > Check all 4 returned next hops. (Vladimir) > > ... Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin -- Regards, Vladimir