From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA44A68F8 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lfbn-1-5996-232.w90-110.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.110.195.232] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz31v-00014z-3A; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:48:43 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=c3=b8rup?= , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Richardson, Bruce" References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8B1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <7910CF2F-7087-4307-A9AC-DE0287104185@intel.com> <20161024162538.GA34988@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161025093915.GJ5733@6wind.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8B7@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <20161025110444.GK5733@6wind.com> <20161025111357.GA43504@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8BA@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <20161025122008.GA54704@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8BB@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <20161025124508.GA59784@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <4427b23b-e9c0-4e43-9c28-fb7e56da745c@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0CC805@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8C1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil , "Wiles, Keith" , dev@dpdk.org, Oleg Kuporosov From: Olivier Matz Message-ID: <13fa309c-3cdb-f2da-f241-d56c471e3f40@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:45:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8C1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:45:23 -0000 On 10/25/2016 04:25 PM, Morten Brørup wrote: > It might also make sense documenting the mbuf fields in more detail somewhere. E.g. the need for nb_segs in the NIC's TX handler. Good point, I'll do it at the same time than the first rework proposition.