From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355F3432EB; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:29:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C640DF8; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:28:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFCB40299; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE0F5C02F0; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:28:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:28:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1699568934; x=1699655334; bh=QdVJgvtPuONlA873SkHfOeq4t3q7xal7kTL mbFFeLFE=; b=s1vbyHvDUH0oGVOTeR62VPnrwFrNXejy4zeZ/vodS6fjU23pHyB M/EW39ycqULg+aVGf0bh7I+a0opg0uSOMe9fKQHNmkfPgNHJXVDTCqEgBdQX6ceZ K/K2d8y1/zlEqGm7+5IaGkImn2A2L+BIU0y+YycYfICMa4V7PVJR+9JIyN1S3JnS 1SpimCA3UESiWFvwQFp1rQ+N5p1mAU6L0GMiIUgIJkvsg+u83NNQ9Tbld31Rvw/J UR72yb3mhq/F71UURJrHJPcw/oijEfCFlYTBCBfAdi7D/eW0EJsKBP1G05AiygTE iVW/2z1G+zgvLpQGUWJEySoOs3Y4w8K24/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1699568934; x=1699655334; bh=QdVJgvtPuONlA873SkHfOeq4t3q7xal7kTL mbFFeLFE=; b=THN136cW6MiTHFsQCy3xxhYP+qASub+ZITvdL73P7RfngQcTD8I yCzpszX9cp5VQDRttbtYWdisijxftN8Nl8aWMsdqbBKYcF4thg+37pgHMiYoNmG5 O3FOCUSc1QajgOQDY+W89XnJNmkJcuUT5zcM/enQpFpVxfFFkOsU000es5aB5WKE 8L+ahasQ59QHvTz+xXymM44Be33i8fIdrbY52Yor9oRC+MCuJ1oBTVzb3Bh9nU9A evFPRkrEbHjmeeV/yDOt9xbscVWBb+dkhUpE225zjzr2La6TW3ajZp3ur7XZQ8bI e185w00GuGDLsx4U3l/dacwQfTyMvMpdY7w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedruddvuddgudeitdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:28:53 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Akhil Goyal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, vattunuru@marvell.com, techboard@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] examples/l2fwd-macsec: add MACsec forwarding application Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 23:28:51 +0100 Message-ID: <14164652.lVVuGzaMjS@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20231109210122.2493856-1-gakhil@marvell.com> References: <20231103073226.1154242-1-gakhil@marvell.com> <20231109210122.2493856-1-gakhil@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Akhil, 09/11/2023 22:01, Akhil Goyal: > Added a new application based on l2fwd to demonstrate inline protocol > offload MACsec performance using rte_security APIs. In general we try to avoid adding a new example application. Does this one has been discussed already with the techboard? We need a good justification for an exception. Why not merging it in l2fwd-crypto?