From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109C743B08; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:57:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FAA40262; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:57:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1704021D for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:57:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6F53200A09; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 12:57:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 12:57:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1708279020; x=1708365420; bh=pGyhB5j+Zit0P0tuLmAzaTbz+FzZaOtluEnP6FhYl7s=; b= n+alyDPsro1CgyfFGh2wuAY49jGs/9WihML1vQAfIKTnEbQ6VOC6bsHhqY15Q923 szW1SKAAqaO5l2F6CaigNwEkKhkksefZnl0AOHNTQ5aSBdgtcHEV1QQlqQjG4n0X 93ikF6EPHoL6gOEiGvd0lUU+47efErT6/uzGyqfTc6DPEvAx2w2SctviMG7S2EBr 1MvJC5gQTfwmxiPInILYyZTlH7RoENnefOreibmoZH30ZU+SPith8LzJuJ3k0KYc YoWGiaR/7lE/0YlFaLV6EYg1m3eBYxEh3uRD9CCJPOYR6Ih2Kt8t6Uyu7TFvacZs Sz/ld4btIdLQtmAW/5cMzg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1708279020; x= 1708365420; bh=pGyhB5j+Zit0P0tuLmAzaTbz+FzZaOtluEnP6FhYl7s=; b=B c/kw3OJHrU3gnwWgj0DX1nc7gUDBqmusIzMolkYhNnEvfZtEPPb043DrFfELyYDh K0ldvHh5p6Fm8c2SLMBpnGMP7/SLqVT/nJAOmfmdLlllWwNOoLO5D6LZcfXWeAZz xYyz1ek/MSvznImE3IriPrJkZWbguHhrb60AQhQk2Ovz6AcEVeb4CgrJzlijRZCo RezYJxvFMhRFaubKALkf/+Ne0vNQD2fAx3yEvxnVgcLhb+MySnxCrDmEhVCgHcCh t1vHei29M0x7gN8cTfuT5GX3M6aolbC49pW1071vaFRxUx/VnW2KUs1o6QJD8tOc +nSyJ/kIm3OgTq1Sg0L9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeigddutdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 12:56:59 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Joyce Kong Cc: ruifeng.wang@arm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Honnappa Nagarahalli Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:56:58 +0100 Message-ID: <14316419.VsHLxoZxqI@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20231205035259.3516625-3-joyce.kong@arm.com> References: <20230822074743.3243015-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20231205035259.3516625-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20231205035259.3516625-3-joyce.kong@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 05/12/2023 04:52, Joyce Kong: > The cpu info in some cross files is inconsistent with > that in SoC flags. The mismatch doesn't cause any issue > because the cpu field in the cross file takes no effect > and machine_args in config/arm/meson.build actually works. > Use a common one in cross files to remove any confusion. > > Reported-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang [...] > --- a/config/arm/arm64_armada_linux_gcc > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_armada_linux_gcc > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pcap-config = '' > [host_machine] > system = 'linux' > cpu_family = 'aarch64' > -cpu = 'armv8-a' > +cpu = 'aarch64' Why aarch64 here and below? > --- a/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pkgconfig = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-pkg-config' > [host_machine] > system = 'linux' > cpu_family = 'aarch64' > -cpu = 'armv8-a' > +cpu = 'auto' [...] > --- a/config/arm/arm64_hip10_linux_gcc > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_hip10_linux_gcc > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ pcap-config = '' > [host_machine] > system = 'linux' > cpu_family = 'aarch64' > -cpu = 'armv8-a' > +cpu = 'aarch64'