From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCFCA00C2; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 21:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774C04122E; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 21:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0191411FE for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 21:06:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D25C0139; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:06:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:06:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=bW26CkA6fdBS5f i1zNW0/TAuRVN9BzqIo6HLBlJ4xok=; b=pnQP23m0m9laqZ1ubjAwcBfevVVXEI 0CgaEFtoRQWAMOwmFjT/2Fe0jY3HbRSs9ocpAy5wl84roaeNv501iLvADhGHt0M+ kSEnuy0cgGb+q49rYmH5RdwTyjkGCDBiDflr1mmWLXfvO9aZw8bLKNg097gVNtMB xV28QHIzEzvwVDSaZaNuIkCw4cSU0LC3JtBNnz+7zLGCBg44i9N4dxpZOVD7xOWm vZT2uyh5oXErj3V3o4XY9dfbX68bIQxHR4FTgSqR96AxER6ueWsFXje5ytJeIO8e BSzA2V5WZ0e8xmcfuJxpsiHhPXmYDdXMsSlhV5PPwxmVmyXgvAToeucg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=bW26CkA6fdBS5fi1zNW0/TAuRVN9BzqIo6HLBlJ4x ok=; b=FPzyokBjxyLI37FJrPH/DdBw6IwoROP2T06qQOBbgoqgs7L4N7ot4fkTc 9VTQTd7lI0F4u2oKsPR4Js5ZB89ul3xj1OhhBI854qqWqdah8e3JN0yohHRUAnUt ern8uJQ1khO2Axw0ezZHw9lmFdyZHmI/6zLAEiZLsMpSsFE2e4WnBt/qBG4U8IzL kLcGTKl4WwMB35jdrT1NMJK0/c+j++raijmlv1N1KdU598qvSGSy+ZwOSUMAvhPj M0VzI2BZJAz1xYLBo38QHWoGW4gStJHjgkJ2aMMr1eXhYHGYUYjF4LTUcDd0wPxB HidcfGKufb0uO+zuCzHovZV2SwChQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddugedgudeffecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:06:40 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Haiyue Wang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob , Kiran Kumar K , Nithin Dabilpuram , Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] graph: remove the useless duplicate name check Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 21:06:38 +0100 Message-ID: <14457131.VsHLxoZxqI@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <0220307064318.1002855-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> <20220307102556.1011130-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 07/03/2022 13:47, Jerin Jacob: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 4:30 PM Haiyue Wang wrote: > > > > The node clone API parameter 'name' is the new node's postfix name, not > > the final node name, so it makes no sense to check it. And the new name > > will be checked duplicate when calling API '__rte_node_register'. > > > > And update the test case to call clone API twice to check the real name > > duplicate. > > > > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang > > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied, thanks.