From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7708A9190 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:14:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2015 06:14:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,218,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="675038111" Received: from shvmail01.sh.intel.com ([10.239.29.42]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2015 06:14:48 -0700 Received: from shecgisg004.sh.intel.com (shecgisg004.sh.intel.com [10.239.29.89]) by shvmail01.sh.intel.com with ESMTP id t9UDEl8i021652; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:14:47 +0800 Received: from shecgisg004.sh.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shecgisg004.sh.intel.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id t9UDEi57014284; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:14:46 +0800 Received: (from jijiangl@localhost) by shecgisg004.sh.intel.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id t9UDEiJ9014280; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:14:44 +0800 From: Jijiang Liu To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:14:38 +0800 Message-Id: <1446210879-14242-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.2 In-Reply-To: <1446210879-14242-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> References: <1446210879-14242-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/lpm:fix an issue of condition check in delete_depth_small() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:14:57 -0000 Fixes an issue of check logic in delete_depth_small function. For a tbl24 entry, the 'ext_entry' field indicates whether we need to use tbl8_gindex to read the next_hop from a tbl8 entry, or whether it can be read directly from this entry. If a route is deleted, the prefix of previous route is used to override the deleted route. When checking the depth of the previous route the conditional checks both the ext_entry and the depth, but the "else" leg fails to take account that the condition could fail for one of two possible reasons, leading to an incorrect flow when 'ext_entry == 0' is true , but 'lpm->tbl24[i].depth > depth' is false. The fix here is to add a condition check to the else leg so that it only executes when ext_entry is set. Signed-off-by: NaNa --- lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c index 163ba3c..57ec2f0 100644 --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c @@ -734,8 +734,7 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 0 && lpm->tbl24[i].depth <= depth ) { lpm->tbl24[i].valid = INVALID; - } - else { + } else if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 1) { /* * If TBL24 entry is extended, then there has * to be a rule with depth >= 25 in the @@ -780,8 +779,7 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 0 && lpm->tbl24[i].depth <= depth ) { lpm->tbl24[i] = new_tbl24_entry; - } - else { + } else if (lpm->tbl24[i].ext_entry == 1) { /* * If TBL24 entry is extended, then there has * to be a rule with depth >= 25 in the -- 1.7.7.6