From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059A93237 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:18:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id r129so69597441wmr.0 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:18:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=uFKPrx3sQsl1+eXaJGQUC/kX1WsEO3DYdHNuO32UpkQ=; b=IwW8JPhDVed72Fx9lvpVRJfec29MUjW/hX+7ID2AEIt9ikEQmycAdrk7sQP1jw87/X 9uAjRTtU4QRszO2eCgVpeV0jvqbQ4F0vq90ZJkccggOaTDhAeA4Cmm8xBDy3rzdJWdBv F1P1cpaaxxC2gSexeNC9u3Ud17IHjD+/hFJCBsitnw9TpU4EzJ7750hoM5qvZ+pyWQl8 AAy77Gqn8qk/MLfnFqh+bAYaMQq6VkuKQahdCbZdCrmL8x5D9VBDj9UWbYsMksvNVd6P asxTbXVMCmjtfEQWC8wOGaMAoEIrCE0wJ3NQecEhO4mA+7EmMZaR/8z/vXNADnJUFduj iOfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=uFKPrx3sQsl1+eXaJGQUC/kX1WsEO3DYdHNuO32UpkQ=; b=YWxUuXxGhDc6mnj/IGF90kwLar1O0W0+3MEXT+Xm1x4R2uhDlEzU3DIkNnIL/dNMCa eCtau3NxMtyCMVAQ3YJfpfxT398RkR+ONEUC8aHKG+wXSylPW655KNU9NVE2O1bpuqPJ DG7hfby/46PDmm2kS9opb5zKGXMudwkT+WutDbrBKajvGy7UZLL8XPdzVoBj26cMaVqb zxzLEjJLMWN9yZm8XkAK+KKCZK+fCvAsR+ZMvc01jGrCYlxyeOuJmoSnOC3Lagh1atXZ 4gPssv6aKYYAaoazmOleQD3XMX24MYtT1wD/hSGSEfSnoYj+cN5HRuASX1V4XDjrqR5K kClw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTZbonQ4NBYeM+EpEBtrfrozOCE86B5qNpDkamUOU+EfyufIZHlV3Bli4sXge9ZvDEs X-Received: by 10.194.185.199 with SMTP id fe7mr9944631wjc.50.1454797122912; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e9sm22167710wja.25.2016.02.06.14.18.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: david.marchand@6wind.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:17:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1454797033-24057-6-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0 In-Reply-To: <1454797033-24057-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1454453993-3903-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1454797033-24057-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, viktorin@rehivetech.com Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] eal: remove compiler optimization workaround X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 22:18:43 -0000 The compiler optimization was disabled a long time ago without describing what was the exact issue. Maybe it does not apply anymore. As it looks unneeded, let's remove this strange pragma. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon --- lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c index a4c5a29..ecb1240 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c @@ -36,19 +36,6 @@ #include #include -/* - * This should prevent use of advanced instruction sets in this file. Otherwise - * the check function itself could cause a crash. - */ -#ifdef __INTEL_COMPILER -#pragma optimize ("", off) -#else -#define GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 + __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) -#if GCC_VERSION > 404000 -#pragma GCC optimize ("O0") -#endif -#endif - /** * Checks if the machine is adequate for running the binary. If it is not, the * program exits with status 1. -- 2.7.0