From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF21A04DC; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A04ACFD; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FBCACEE for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:47:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0865C0237; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:47:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:47:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= mL1pV90BvI0i7k+xvWyQtv8/hHDlbZo7jEvJPqchmSE=; b=Xhs9LanfuinSSYHO GttN/atlm6UddZhhTwLzz7NDC8qPqVMhI0cJ9jjiSnwuKWYZh5HMvBJQmi5tHFgk lxOTGvF4gDV9sIh/+973LmkVfG08a7QvYD/3n+Dzni87l1oZmur0hReRrlCF3EyQ pg27CDBXpQcPR+AdlPqqASCapaQROWfW0Xwy3fYo8Lo2R1+ks/YMAa4KOcFQ67dj Y/d4Vo8V5bE3BPPHgbON10UEwMRbSWrof82dpwYR83PFYkqPJK/MXozHbMasE3ek xDGp7CkOYsRGzrHCC3TfvR8FHh1VwDpXG+ujL5Hzse7gSgImmnaprn+hkPw8cTbL CR+GAg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mL1pV90BvI0i7k+xvWyQtv8/hHDlbZo7jEvJPqchm SE=; b=PW528mrMYlpjwOGgsIk9Xed5iBLqt9kz0QFJwcyCfy11NUwCryOo3rnQb B8afi7VPZsdvRmlyFj1BuMD3kI2bsJCYCKqdwmuCSwUt9Ss+aKttzQgfI6d2b06X AnXrQWIKk07np+LiS6isqvVjpysPe+3XP++waTD/VxljmAIBA7JeJKsvMctiyLhS qkyzGuoSGnHeEj8w0DpDWvDuM90j1Tu/Se7QN7hmgSPwxVD8Fck9JlYlmvDopt04 ROplYUL68lElMSRQzDTvwOVuFVq2kt7PWlA07bSwvjAOfL0YcXZ3HER1LXk04qKE yanNZUIcVa4zIf2xfdIsXi3l/Pddg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrjeefgdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FE263064674; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:47:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tal Shnaiderman Cc: dev@dpdk.org, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com, dmitrym@microsoft.com, ophirmu@nvidia.com, Dmitry Kozlyuk Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:47:21 +0200 Message-ID: <145746135.qdezSroZQ7@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20201020123752.6e266990@sovereign> References: <20201020084815.13796-1-talshn@nvidia.com> <20201020123752.6e266990@sovereign> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/windows: fix missing header inclusion X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/10/2020 11:37, Dmitry Kozlyuk: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:48:15 +0300, Tal Shnaiderman wrote: > > Following the addition of the in_addr/in6_addr structs > > to in.h the header file must have stdint.h included > > for the definitions of the uint8_t/uint32_t types used > > within the new structs. > > > > Not having it could results in the following errors > > in places where in.h is included: > > > > in.h:30:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t' > > uint32_t s_addr; > > > > in.h:34:2: error: unknown type name 'uint8_t' > > uint8_t s6_addr[16]; > > > > Fixes: f40a74cfcf0 ("eal/windows: improve compatibility networking headers") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org Removing stable@dpdk.org as the bug is only in current release. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman > > Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk Applied, thanks