From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15958A0C45; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 23:56:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B950A40688; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 23:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C2340685 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 23:56:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780CF58102F; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:56:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= rzbp5JvZYPht6e66uSiBfRc6XIWP4NQtbfDsVZhYDkc=; b=WcdQtKEXmGZjpga5 UshYxLwx+RnhvJMrqVeU4h7aVW3Op29rp2VqIi2Wp7AkR1sg2fhZfU/c4711xEA4 lciX2kL6yAQhyIGZFQivdhebvCcJXBIbZSdZ0mfkJIRlShlY+1yfEH4uRiIWR+9C g47Xz6Ke94TdaOUOGVrUfohmE9ZeLYDFMsYzO+yILeM/kuL9cFdhAnZqNQr91GtN tTXn2+jKJL8+JNnWrm4G3h/k1PpkoLH36v/Xc3GjuU0uRRrsXkSLNaXSXftxnIyA Tnre/tKoyUvO7IMrZNtyDe6GZOMdrEEnATY/K4C0b3aWSOl9qlCfIAdnJYqFxgQ0 Nfle2A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=rzbp5JvZYPht6e66uSiBfRc6XIWP4NQtbfDsVZhYD kc=; b=aYRLROGogtbrrXWigtzqC8+h5xeH9+PZLkNvVcg819DXtqvCy3Mf2xgw7 6j24UWBT9fZmlS/WrD/jEtqFuim9+qKOXJq76WrwbUetJab8zxz/SOjQjYeJHxJp IDys6x4i/PRaOIxtPmUHDHa9SR64/rpCLi9LILUxsi6Lim12ivOT6vtqV+k41pOh TP63js2CvY92RASjY+yKbFjtjYuyGjJgyMRaDZwgqK05o2/FMjMpIU855rywbL0j ICp1ZUjDj3kid7BxxTdWtsrviLFSvY3OKJL1o3Z0uWUtiRxQGHcZJP3wN8Kq42dS v/0kiK1+D+ty0O3W/vtkqgbxSSj5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudelhedgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:56:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: Ajit Khaparde , Somnath Kotur , John Daley , Hyong Youb Kim , Beilei Xing , Qiming Yang , Qi Zhang , Haiyue Wang , Matan Azrad , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, Viacheslav Galaktionov Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 23:56:34 +0200 Message-ID: <14586794.58kHr3nmNG@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210913112633.2836730-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> References: <20210712161747.958019-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> <20210913112633.2836730-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: fix representor port ID search by name X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 13/09/2021 13:26, Andrew Rybchenko: > From: Viacheslav Galaktionov > > Getting a list of representors from a representor does not make sense. > Instead, a parent device should be used. I don't understand which issue it is fixing. This function was not working before if not using the backer port? Is it fixing a specific PMD?