From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.212.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E386C7E6E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Oct 2014 14:43:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so10475823wib.15
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=356QHyWjX6krCyQN/1JOCl/NFQSgxcPmyFW6LFVr+BE=;
 b=Om/KLTG2MZsOwUKndfv44Ee3B2FF9S7OAzf7I9/mcd8rROBC+ElXyhNG8bvTx66YYs
 KDZDQg12i779sz+ZHYnNm4aPc790p8BZYcm1Yx54uSjg/36M3AjKWcNp3kjHkkZEXUam
 OuOgdNBfAu/36EM9WXZtdrOsXmjKeogMCOVW4ifqjt4p2i2LVXG+9oYy76m1JDuZk/+5
 W9YstrL/tcm7UhZGl1vnFCIQD1Hkn7QjO/5OC+X/nJ2yPMMS+hcPosCg1CsyKFfXLffx
 1Ge9ZRb+i2xAq8V7tg9vz7OPNeYqJRLIgzkhaJ5MePe/AkxK+uG5ktccNBOkaPrr3oXD
 BdYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnb6ikQev5nSID+HMVxHNeSmnvA5d5hdflnfURrRhLVbXanN+RWhlWtuC4Xg6gJXEUg1+24
X-Received: by 10.180.85.66 with SMTP id f2mr11337440wiz.34.1412772644089;
 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w13sm3852745wjq.29.2014.10.08.05.50.41
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:50:26 +0200
Message-ID: <1467636.AzLFRR9WOp@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1412350612-23190-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
References: <1412350612-23190-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Adjust mbuf flag definitions
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:43:27 -0000

2014-10-03 16:36, Bruce Richardson:
> This patchset does some cleanup work on the mbuf flag definitions. It is 
> based off the ideas discussed in the previous RFC patch. 
> [Ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/6155]
> 
> Summary of changes:
> * Adjust TX flags to start at bit 55 in flags field and work downwards,
>   leaving bits 56 upward reserved for generic mbuf flags, i.e. non-offload
>   flags.
> * Update the existing RX flags to be in a similar format to the newly
>   redefined TX flags for clarity.
> * Finally we add a comment for the ctrl mbuf flag to ensure all flags are
>   properly documented.
> 
> Bruce Richardson (3):
>   mbuf: move TX flags to group them near end of field
>   mbuf: RX flag format update
>   mbuf: add comment for ctrl mbuf flag

Acked and applied

Thanks
-- 
Thomas