DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce KNI ethtool removal
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:07:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469030873-5966-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> (raw)

The out-of-tree kernel code must be avoided.
Moreover there is no good reason to keep this legacy feature
which is only partially supported.

As described earlier in this plan:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/043606.html
it will help to keep PCI ids in PMD code.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
---
 doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index f502f86..9cadf6a 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -41,3 +41,10 @@ Deprecation Notices
 * The mempool functions for single/multi producer/consumer are deprecated and
   will be removed in 16.11.
   It is replaced by rte_mempool_generic_get/put functions.
+
+* The ethtool support will be removed from KNI in 16.11.
+  It is implemented only for igb and ixgbe.
+  It is really hard to maintain because it requires some out-of-tree kernel
+  code to be duplicated in this kernel module.
+  Removing this partial support will help to restrict the PCI id definitions
+  to the PMD code.
-- 
2.7.0

             reply	other threads:[~2016-07-20 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 16:07 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-07-21 15:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 15:41   ` Igor Ryzhov
2016-07-21 16:41     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-26 13:23       ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-26 13:42         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-21 18:20   ` Jay Rolette
2016-07-21 20:32     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-21 20:54       ` Jay Rolette
2016-07-21 23:15         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 17:20         ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2016-07-26 13:18           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469030873-5966-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).