DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com,
	Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix hash multiwriter test
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2016 23:34:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475793290-185602-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> (raw)

Hash multiwriter test consists of two subtests.
If the any of the subtests fails, the overall test should fail,
but the overall test only passed if the second subtest passed,
because the return of the first subtest was being overwritten.

Fixes: be856325cba3 ("hash: add scalable multi-writer insertion with Intel TSX")

Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c b/app/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c
index 40af95d..4dcbd9d 100644
--- a/app/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c
+++ b/app/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c
@@ -247,8 +247,6 @@ err1:
 static int
 test_hash_multiwriter_main(void)
 {
-	int r = -1;
-
 	if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) {
 		printf("More than one lcore is required to do multiwriter test\n");
 		return 0;
@@ -268,14 +266,16 @@ test_hash_multiwriter_main(void)
 		printf("Test multi-writer with Hardware transactional memory\n");
 
 		use_htm = 1;
-		r = test_hash_multiwriter();
+		if (test_hash_multiwriter() < 0)
+			return -1;
 	}
 
 	printf("Test multi-writer without Hardware transactional memory\n");
 	use_htm = 0;
-	r = test_hash_multiwriter();
+	if (test_hash_multiwriter() < 0)
+		return -1;
 
-	return r;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(hash_multiwriter_autotest, test_hash_multiwriter_main);
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-06 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-06 22:34 Pablo de Lara [this message]
2016-10-13 13:00 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1475793290-185602-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).