From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com
Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix tso with csum engine
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:40:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476366030-28321-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> (raw)
The commit that disabled tso for small packets was broken during the
rebase. The problem is the IP checksum is not calculated in software if:
- TX IP checksum is disabled
- TSO is enabled
- the current packet is smaller than tso segment size
When checking if the PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM flag should be set (in case
of tso), use the local tso_segsz variable, which is set to 0 when the
packet is too small to require tso. Therefore the IP checksum will be
correctly calculated in software.
Moreover, we should not use tunnel segment size for non-tunnel tso, else
TSO will stay disabled for all packets.
Fixes: 97c21329d42b ("app/testpmd: do not use TSO for small packets")
Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
index f9e65b6..27d0f08 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ process_inner_cksums(void *l3_hdr, const struct testpmd_offload_info *info,
if (!info->is_tunnel) {
max_pkt_len = info->l2_len + info->l3_len + info->l4_len +
info->tso_segsz;
- if (info->tunnel_tso_segsz != 0 && info->pkt_len > max_pkt_len)
+ if (info->tso_segsz != 0 && info->pkt_len > max_pkt_len)
tso_segsz = info->tso_segsz;
} else {
max_pkt_len = info->outer_l2_len + info->outer_l3_len +
@@ -351,9 +351,7 @@ process_inner_cksums(void *l3_hdr, const struct testpmd_offload_info *info,
ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4;
- if (info->l4_proto == IPPROTO_TCP &&
- ((info->is_tunnel && info->tunnel_tso_segsz != 0) ||
- (!info->is_tunnel && info->tso_segsz != 0))) {
+ if (info->l4_proto == IPPROTO_TCP && tso_segsz) {
ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
} else {
if (testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_CKSUM)
--
2.8.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 13:40 Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-10-13 14:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476366030-28321-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).